Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It can not be denied that people who specialize in one skill are able to having a good command of it,leading them to step deeper in that specific area. This fact may lead some impressionable people to generate the opinion that people with one skill are more likely to succeed. However, this opinion suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be scrutinize meticulously. As far as the broad friend circle, the opportunities when pursuing for jobs and the broad knowledge of having a grasp of divergent skills are concerned, I strongly hold the opinions that people with divergent skills are of great like to succeed.
Firstly, developing wealth of different skills endows people opportunities to broad their social circle. By developing divergent skills, people are required to participate in different courses or diverse online lecture. Taking an active part in these activities, people are offered accessible ways to know different people who sought to learn the same skill. The courses or lectures offer them a platform to communicate with them about how to enhance their dexterity and hone the skills well enough. Through striving for having a good command of these skills together, it may narrow the gap between them. As a result, they are more likely to have acquaintance with diverse people who make an endeavor to learn the same skills.
Secondly, people equipped with different skills are more likely to be offered more opportunities when pursuing for jobs. Nowadays, we have witnessed that the labor marker has an increasingly demand for people who have a grasp of divergent skills. For example, my friend Jimmy, who major in the computer science and also take the economic as his second degree. Not only majoring in computer science weapons him with divergent methods of algorithm, which can be applied to solve perplexing problems, but also majoring in economic provide him a more ideal vision to view the financial market. Thanks to the different skills gained in the university, Jimmy got an offer from renowned Fund Company, assuming responsibility to employ computer algorithm to solve out actual conundrum in the stock market.
Thirdly, a voice may arises that having a solid grasp of one skill can help people better specialize it. Ironically, this statement does not hold under scrutinize meticulously-not all people can go far in one area like what renowned scientists have did so far because of the lack of some intelligence. Under this circumstance, diverting more time to make yourselves can be better alternative.
In conclusion, a certain exposure to education from larger universities will definitely create better experience for students. There are one thousand Hamlets in one thousand eyes, yet I am confident that my opponents will compromise to me after being shown to my article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , leading
... are able to having a good command of it,leading them to step deeper in that specific ar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'scrutinized'?
Suggestion: scrutinized
...and factual fallacies, and it should be scrutinize meticulously. As far as the broad frien...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('increasingly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('demand') instead of another adjective.
...ave witnessed that the labor marker has an increasingly demand for people who have a grasp of divergen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...area like what renowned scientists have did so far because of the lack of some inte...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16086956522 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81244533658 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513043478261 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8836798794 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.7 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292241659799 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989819687824 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694245039569 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158468668588 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830942669513 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.