Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
By and large, human beings are perpetually seeking techniques to explore and cultivate their skills. Referring to that, the selection between various abilities to grow can be a baffling question for them. As a result, some people believe that it may be a better idea to focus on one skill, instead of attempting to develop multiple skills at the same time. I can not agree more with this idea and two reasons I elaborately discussed in the following help the substantiation of my perspective.
For the first reason, my contention is that people who concentrate on one skill are more likely to be productive because they can put more effort into the selected talent and gain expertise. It is a widely acknowledged fact that prosperity is a result of consistency. So, people who spend an extensive amount of time practicing a skill eventually become masters of that particular field. For instance, as the results of research performed on the greatest contemporary artists depict, almost all of them corroborate that long-time deliberate practice has the most prominent role in their growth. Had not these people chosen to disregard other skills, they would not have enough time to strengthen their picked ones by hard effort.
Another equally important reason that portrays the significance of focusing on one skill is that it can facilitate the endeavours of people in finding a well-paid job that guarantees their future,. sinceThe more time people put into a profession, the more proficient they will be. Generally speaking, our lives are too short to be used in experiencing different fields. Thus, spending time on a varied range of skills can be a kind of trial-and-error and may lead to an immense waste of time. In other words, as we enlarge the boundaries of our examinations and start to try new fields, the possibility of failure increases. Adding to that, in this hectic world we currently live in, vocations are hugely demanding for highly skilled people who are experts in their field.
In conclusion, what this essay boils down to is that in a world full of distractions, focus can be the key element that helps people foster their abilities and make a more promising future for themselves.
- Plain of jars TPO 59 83
- Spartacus 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ll-paid job that guarantees their future,. sinceThe more time people put into a pr...
^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: SinceThe
...paid job that guarantees their future,. sinceThe more time people put into a profession,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 742, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ely demanding for highly skilled people who are experts in their field. In conclusi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, then, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, by and large, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0027100271 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88183828217 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582655826558 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9984653737 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.375 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26962363194 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858877028185 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773073825401 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163910301978 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467368706035 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.