Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Students play an essential role in our society as they build our future. There is no doubt that teachers have positive and negative implications of sharing social or political viewpoints in a class. I would propose to restrain from sharing social or political views by teachers in the study. I had a firm belief that teachers should keep their ideas personal for several reasons, and develop them in the subsequent paragraphs.

To begin with, teachers can influence the children's decisions by sharing their viewpoints on social or political system. To elaborate, teachers are the role model for the students; consequently, children try to imitate the behavior of their respective teachers without differentiating the right and wrong aspects of a system. I must say that my personal opinion profoundly influenced my opinion on this matter. For example, when I was a school student, one of our English teacher who was influenced by a national political party named Congress, always share a positive side of the referred party. As a result, I voted for this referred party without checking their manifesto when I was legally eligible to cast my vote. Although, later, in the next election, I realized my mistake and read specifically about all the parties. As we can see from this instance that teachers can influence the decision of students by sharing their political and social view
points.

Secondly, teachers waste students time by sharing their personal views in class. More specifically, children come to a school to study different subjects such as English, Maths, Science, etc.. However, in the case of teachers start to explain their viewpoint, the same leads to unproductive time for students. Drawing from my brother's experience, he went to study music classes from one experienced teacher. Although his music teacher was quite knowledgable and experienced, he wasted twenty minutes out of one hour in every category while sharing his social views of particular citizens. He explained that they came from Bihar to Delhi in search of jobs and were negatively affecting the lifestyle of other people by offering the services at a low price. For this reason, teachers waste students time by sharing their viewpoints in a class.

Given the reasons mentioned, I firmly recommend that teachers should not share their political and social viewpoints in the class as these views not only influence the children's decision, but also waste their valuable time.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-10-23 HSNDEK 73 view
2022-10-23 HSNDEK 73 view
2022-07-19 Hello GRE 60 view
2022-07-01 sarasabzi 70 view
2022-06-12 nida fatima 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user batravision27 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...aspects of a system. I must say that my personal opinion profoundly influenced my opinion on thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 955, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sharing their political and social view points. Secondly, teachers waste stud...
^^^
Line 6, column 191, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...cts such as English, Maths, Science, etc.. However, in the case of teachers start ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20603015075 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78292618743 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525125628141 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8488291633 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.052631579 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214425124375 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806307455639 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062454617714 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15951760039 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267607328049 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.