Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Is it true for teachers to make their social or political views known to students in the classroom? When it comes to the question of being known or not, the answers differ considerably from individual and individual. Some are adamant that it would restrict students' views when they know the views from teachers, while others hold squarely opposite statements. Both of the counter statements appear to be convincing and stand to reason, yet my personal experience and real-life observations have lead me to conclude that avoid being known to students should be a suitable behavior. More reasons and examples are shed light on as follows.
To begin with, teachers' role is to cultivate student's ability to consider independently to the issues, and not being known to students about views is beneficial to cultivate. To be more specific, teachers should avoid stating their social and political views to their students in the classroom, because students' recognition is probably restricted by these views. For example, when the teacher leads their students to discuss whether the government should use nuclear power and she expresses her own opinion on this issue, students who are still incapable of independent thinking might see the teacher's view as their own views. On the other hand, if the teacher only stands in the leading role to encourage students to think independently, students can learn independent thinking. Then, they will not be affected by other fake opinions or illogical statements which are widespread in this information explosion era.
In addition, it is essential for teachers to stand on the neutral side to any kind of issue in the classroom, and camouflaging their own perspectives can make them be more suitable to pretend this role. That is to say, when students ask the teacher his or her opinion on social or political issues in class, it is not appropriate to state his own view. For instance, the same-sexual marriage issue is controversial in society. If teachers state that they do not support homosexual people marry together, students who are not sophisticated probably mock and bully those homosexual students. However, if the teacher rejects to answer the question from students, they will not know what is the teacher's view. Thus, it can decrease the possibility of bullying and discrimination in the classroom.
In conclusion, avoiding expressing teachers' perspectives to students is pivotal. That is, since teachers' role of cultivating students to think independently and standing in a neutral place, making their social or political not known to students in the classroom is necessary.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22511848341 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90865266517 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483412322275 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3304077831 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61111111111 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367515762205 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126695817442 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953619602032 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246715306961 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297819957862 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.