Essay topics: TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.
There are so many famous people with various ideas and notions. In other words, fame has brought many people the position to state their opinions publically and receiving some advocates from the public. But, whether everyone in a society value these opinions is a matter of controversy. In my point of view, I suppose such opinions are more important to youngsters than to the old people simply because the elderly are much more experienced and are not as much exposed to these ideas. In other words, I strongly agree with the statement in the question.
To commence, often the elderly do not keep track of the opinions and statements of the celebrities and consequently, they do not value these notions once they hear about them. Generally speaking, there are lots of ways in which young people follow the celebrities such as their clothing style, their haircut, and their ideas. Besides, there are numerous ways that youngsters get information about famous entertainers and athletes, take Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook for example. Through their new life, the young are exposed to many statements coming from celebrities and therefore these opinions have become so crucial to young-aged people these days.
Secondly, the older people are far more experienced than the young, making them think more logically. Actually, they only accept logical reasoning, they do not get emotional, and they can distinguish whether a stated opinion is made out of flawless justifications or just is due to momentarily feelings. Besides, they value social notions only when they hear it from those in charge: politicians, economists, or sociologists. To the contrary, the young may not even know anything about politicians and the only thoughts they get informed about are the celebrities'. In comparison to the young, being more aged and thus more experienced, makes the elderly not valuing the celebrities' point of view.
To sum up, old people are not as interested as the young in celebrities' opinions and notions. This could be explained not only because the elderly are not exposed to these thoughts as much as the young are, but they are also far more experienced and know to whom they can trust. Thus, in my opinion, celebrities point of view in not as important to the elderly as it is to the young.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Chengke | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mucahit11 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | zahra.tmmm | 90 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | mohammadkmi | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | catherine0915 | 83 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, consequently, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i suppose, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03412073491 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73354508328 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469816272966 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.497791516 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.823529412 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4117647059 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.70588235294 5.45110844103 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227663067109 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798802156967 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352286843419 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145047482741 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356691404511 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.