government should cancel the fee of education
Education is becoming more and more important to every family of the society since each of them is expecting the next generation to have a better social status in the future. To this end, some people suggest that government should offer free preschool education programs to young children such as 3 years old kids. From my view, this recommendation would be feasible and effective.
To consider roughly, some parents may worry that it is too young to let their baby boys and girls to attend for such program since they are in the age of being cared about to a great extent. However, the educators in such program would be the expert in the field of baby care and they would do even better than parents themselves. In fact, the proposed strategy, would do great merits to both children and parents.
Firstly, through the education of professional educators, little kids would have better process for the growth in various aspects. Not difficult to imagine, young kids would have the chance to get together and follow the instructions of the teacher to eat, to play and to sleep. This would help them to cultivate the healthy living habit which would do benefit for their bodies. Also, they would have the opportunities to discuss with their tutors and other children, causing them to get practiced the social communication ability in a much earlier stage. In addition, some of the basic knowledge learnt from the pre-education program could help them have better efficiency to learn more profound knowledge after entering to primary and higher-level schools.
Such preschool education could help release the burden for modern young parents. It goes without saying that most young people are under high pressure everyday to earn their living since the competition is fairly intensive for all individuals are pursuing high quality of living standard. When talking about young couple who have one or more kids, they need to triple their efforts to the normal running of the whole family. If the proposed program could be implemented widely, these people could get released to a great extent since they could have their babies taken cared without a single payment. So they could focus on their business to get better paid to support their children for better education in the future. A recent report in Japan shows that one Japanese city has offered a free pre-educational course for one year and it is crazily welcomed by all young parents in this city.
To sum up, it would be wise for government to hold and offer free preschool education for small children for the prominent benefits this program could offer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
- These days children spend more time on doing homework or participating in school related activities or sports However they should be given more time to do whatever they want 87
- Children can benefit a lot from taking care of pets 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- government should cancel the fee of education 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...y in a much earlier stage. In addition, some of the basic knowledge learnt from the pre-edu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...st young people are under high pressure everyday to earn their living since the competit...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, in addition, in fact, such as, talking about, to sum up, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96136363636 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49645926951 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504545454545 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9034168032 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.277777778 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0999176812564 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380777933916 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499408944635 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727974695001 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464599010203 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.