Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Although the advent of high technology facilities made learning process easier, the great burden of educating children are still on teachers' shoulders. Personally, I believe it is not a brazen manner if we interrupt and correct the teacher. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, most of the students' knowledge is restricted to teacher's lectures and their notes. Thereby, it rarely happen that students find a conflict between teacher's lectures and another source. Their solitary dependence on teacher's notes will be followed by a permanent misunderstanding in a concept and lay wrong foundations if teachers make a little mistake. As a result, I strongly contend that if we discern something wrong at the classroom, it is our duty to correct it right away. For instance, when I was a sophomore at university, we had a teacher assistant for one of our important subjects who was responsible to solve our homework problems. Once he mentioned a formula wrong and he solved a question based on that. At that time I realized that he's doing it wrong, but I didn't say anything because I thought every one have noticed it. However, at final exam most of the students did the same mistake and lost point. Had I corrected him there, my friends wouldn't have lost point.
The other significant reason is that we are all human and making a mistake even in a subject that we have been teaching for several years is possible. Plus, teacher and students interactions is like a group members communication. Therefore, students must not feel bad for correcting their teacher, since it is exactly the way things work between groupmates. In addition, correcting teacher's notes indicate our high attention to the class, which most of teachers appreciate it. My experience at programming class is a compelling example of this. Our professor wrote a syntax wrong which led to error while compiling the program. I realized it and corrected him right away, and he gave me a positive due to my attention.
In conclusion, based on the aforementioned reasons, subjects which are taught at classrooms are our most valuable source of information, thus it should be thoroughly correct, plus we can show our attention to the class and get out teacher's praise.
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 70
- In many places students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the morning w 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples to supp 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...wing essay. To begin with, most of the students knowledge is restricted to teachers lec...
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'happens'?
...res and their notes. Thereby, it rarely happen that students find a conflict between t...
Line 2, column 761, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...d on that. At that time I realized that hes doing it wrong, but I didnt say anythin...
Line 2, column 787, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...realized that hes doing it wrong, but I didnt say anything because I thought every on...
Line 2, column 970, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
.... Had I corrected him there, my friends wouldnt have lost point. The other significan...
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...d students interactions is like a group members communication. Therefore, students must...
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the teachers') or simply say ''most teachers''.
Suggestion: most of the teachers; most teachers
... our high attention to the class, which most of teachers appreciate it. My experience at program...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9378238342 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88720080377 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564766839378 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9739695729 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164534555123 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517984067464 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372029856491 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105463092709 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020621139543 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.