It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public
In the modern world, the internet has been an important part of our daily life. Without the support of the internet, we are limited to do a variety of works. Therefore, In my point of view, compared to public transportation, governments should provide public internet access. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, improving internet access can provide a better standard of living for citizens. Due to the advance of technology, lots of tasks in our daily life often required us to use the internet such as texting people, shopping online, or even making a phone call. Hence, it can not only makes our life more convenient but also gains a reputation for the government. My city is a compelling example of this idea. The government of my city provides free internet access for every citizen. Two years ago, I forgot to bring my phone with me because I was in a hurry when I leave my house. However, due to the internet provides by the government, I used my laptop to call the company that I will be late because of the commuting problem. As a result, I did a great job in the interview and got hired by the company. Moreover, I voted for the government in the next election because internet access helps him to solve the difficultly. This example demonstrates the advantage of improving Internet access
In addition, having internet access provides a safer living condition. In the period of the pandemic, people are not allowed to go outdoor, there are a large number of things we cannot do because of it. But having said that, having internet access can solve this problem without worrying to infect by the virus. For instance, one of my friends John does not have the internet at his home. A year ago, because of the pandemic, his city has been locked down and he could not even go out for buying a daily necessity. However, due to the internet offer from his government, the park in front of his house has available free WIFI for every citizen. Therefore, whenever he needs to shop, he just needs to head to the park and buy the items he needs online then those things will deliver to his place. If his government does not provide free WIFI, he might already infect the virus on his way to the store.
In conclusion, I strongly believe governments should spend money on internet access. This is because it can provide a better and safer standard of living for citizens.
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 70
- TPO53 Integrated Writing Task 76
- TPO43 integrated writing 85
- The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 85
- The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...ng a phone call. Hence, it can not only makes our life more convenient but also gains...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...re not allowed to go outdoor, there are a large number of things we cannot do because of it. But ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60599078341 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56130943392 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490783410138 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3885984987 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9130434783 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8695652174 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.39130434783 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298582834535 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887839860369 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08949392457 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195034953716 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577868968673 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.