It is more important to keep old friends than to make new friends
Whereas some people believe that it is important to make new friends, I believe that it is more important to maintain your old friendship. Personally, I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explain in the following passage.
First, old friends know you much better than your new friends. It takes time and effort to have a strong bond with anyone, and with our old friend, we have given both. With time, our connection with old friends increases. For example, our bonding will be much better with our school friends than with the friend we make during our working days. Even though people we meet will have the same maturity level, we develop that maturity together with our classmates. In addition, people in our work are more competitive than people we have met during our childhood. In our childhood, we had not entered the real world, so the friendship was also pure at times with no competition in between, and with time we grow together by understanding each other strengths and weaknesses. Thus, childhood friendship is important to me.
Secondly, we can ask for help from our old friends whenever we are in need. We can also trust them to share our secrets. As our childhood or old friend knows us for a long time, we automatically create a bond that feels like a family in the end. Even we do not hesitate to ask for help. However, if we think to ask for help from our new friend, we will definitely hesitate and feel awkward taking help even though our new friend may not feel anything. It is human nature that we do not feel comfortable sharing our though with people until we get close to them. In my personal experience, whenever I feel low or upset, I contact my school friends as they know me very well so their suggestions also depend upon my behavior which they know about me very well. But, if I choose to share the same with my colleague, I will be a little conscious to share it openly.
In conclusion, I would like to say that it is important to keep in contact with your old friends because they know you much better than your new friends. This does not mean that we should not try to make new connections, but when it comes to be with someone at times of difficulty, we are more comfortable with our childhood friends and if time and situation allow, your new relationship with a person will definitely become an old relation one day.
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supportin 50
- It is more important to keep old friends than to make new friends 66
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150 million year old mam mal known as Repenomomus robustus R robustus Interestingly the mammal s stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur Some researchers have therefore suggested that R rob 66
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famous people including kings and writers his memoir has become a 66
- The Communal online encyclopedia 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, i feel, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 79.0 43.0788530466 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53488372093 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5046457645 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458139534884 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0806733211 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289982214849 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110949002138 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104740464579 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218697001878 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715638608471 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.