Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
Undoubtedly, cooperation plays a significant role in people's daily lives in many of the places where they work or play. Some people think that it is not a good way to evaluate students by giving the same grades to every student involving a group project, while others do not. If I were asked to choose one, I would say that the students working on the same project should receive the same mark as it can improve their abilities to cooperate and enhance the quality of the project outcomes. There are several reasons as follows.
First of all, people may come up ideas that have been overlooked by others, as the saying goes, "Two heads are better than one." When people work together, this is likely to bring a better result in their work by reducing the chance of making a mistake. For instance, my friend Jay used to be an independent student programmer as he did not like cowork with others. However, he did poor in university. While other students were actively sharing information on new technology, he only relied on the computer books. However, he has changed after he was forced to participate in a course project, in which every student are to receive the same grade based on the result of the project. He realized that working with others helps him reduce a chance of making mistake and shed light on new way to tackle the given problem. The project was to make a computer program for protecting a server on a network. One of his team member suggested that they could apply artificial intellience technology to a defense algorithm for a better protection performance and it worked out very well. They were able to receive A from the project. If Jay had worked on the project alone, he would not have been able to use the AI algorithm to resolve the problem and received a good grade from the class.
In addition, when students receive the same grade on their project, they are likely to cooperate with their team members to achieve a better result on the project. As modern society is becoming more specialized and competitive, job markets require students with an ability to cooperate with others because it can bring a better result in their work. Thus, giving the same grade to the project members help student obtain a better job position. For example, Jay, who I mentioned in the previous paragraph, was able to receive a job offer from Google Korea. He told me that it was because his project result proves his ability to work with others, which is considered very important in a large company.
All things considered, I firmly believe that all member of a group receive the same mark on their project is important for the reasons I have mentioned above. The importance of cooperation cannot be underestimated in terms of success.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies are worth watching only when they teach people things about real life 73
- Nowadays it is said that government should give financial support to people However people often argue about which group the government should give support to Which of the following groups do you think is the most important for the government to support O 70
- Do you agree with the following statement Nowadays it s easier to maintain good health than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After completing high school students should take at least a year off to work or travel before they begin studying at a university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Which one of the factors do you think is the most important in terms of affecting the friendship 1 always help each other 2 have same interests and views on important things 3 trust each other completely 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1116, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
... very well. They were able to receive A from the project. If Jay had worked on the p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, as for, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74273858921 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57198827885 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47510373444 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.9 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.717584167 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.857142857 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9523809524 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347345648128 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106845850671 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112476185243 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242388406973 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671869577166 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.