in order to be well-informed, people must get information from many different news resources.
In today’s society, we are bombarded by an overwhelming amount of information. Some information is good, some is bad. Some information is new, some is old. Some information is useful, some is useless. Whatever the information is, I believe that in order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources.
When facing social news, we have to get information from many different news sources. Nowadays, a lot of social news comes up every day, and some media try to catch the public’s attention by exaggerating the facts. As far as I know, a famous young actress was reported cheated on her husband. At first time, all the bad words and critics of the whole society go to her. No matter how she argued, no one trusted her. She was almost on the brink of collapse. Later on, the truth was disclosed. She was actually framed by one of her competitors. The competitor made use of cyber-violence to reach her aim. When the public realized that they were deceived, and the condemning to the victim stopped, the harm to her has irreversibly caused. In this case, the public was only informed by one side, and people just believed in it. If the public could get information from many different news sources, the tragedy might not happen.
The same theory should also be applied to people surrounding us. When we first meet someone, we are more likely to judge the person by his or her appearance. However, that’s actually not comprehensive. A person with a poker face might have an extremely warm heart. A person who looks friendly and nice to you might do something secretly to trip you up someday. So, we have to consider all the aspects of the person. We need to observe the person’s working style, and we need to listen to others’ opinion towards the person as well. Until we take all the judgments into consideration, can we get the most accurate information. And that’s what so called ‘critical thinking,’ which we should all learn to develop.
Overall, I fully agree with the statement that in order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Whenever we face a new situation, or we meet a new friend, we should try to analyze all the aspects and get a most comprehensive conclusion as much as possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
.... Some information is new, some is old. Some information is useful, some is useless....
^^^^
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...med, a person must get information from many different news sources. When facing social new...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...l news, we have to get information from many different news sources. Nowadays, a lot of social...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 867, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...f the public could get information from many different news sources, the tragedy might not hap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...med, a person must get information from many different news resources. Whenever we face a new ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, look, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79899497487 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87590885568 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530150753769 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3370794446 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.2142857143 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2142857143 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.78571428571 5.45110844103 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338188281176 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922953349237 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167348869241 0.0737576698707 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237935873753 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129964840569 0.0645574589148 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.