In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Jobs play an integral role in everyday life because people spend a significant amount of time at workplace every day. Having a secure and suitable job would provide people with a feeling of satisfaction in their life; therefore, choosing a job is of the great importance. Although many believe that diversity of jobs in this modern world is in favor of people and nowadays people are prone to easily find a job that suits to them, I hold an opposite point of view. I am of the opinion that in the past it was easier to find a favorable job than today.
First, In the past, people had fewer choices and they had not a wide range of options for choosing a job. This would lead people to remain persistent in doing their job after being employed and do not think of changing their occupation because the job opportunities were limited and scarce. Since being persistent in a job would lead people to prosper in their job and take advantage of their accumulated experience, people were likely to become successful in their job. On the other hand, nowadays, a massive number of jobs are available for the job applicants, which makes it hard to evaluate different job opportunities and eventually make a decision. In addition, people are prone to change their occupation after a short period due to numerous job opportunities. Therefore, they cannot accumulate experience and gain skill in a single activity. As a result lack of experience prevent people from thriving in their job.
Furthermore, In the past, most of the industries and companies used to belong to the government so the employees could take advantage of government's support. This is because government behaves all people same and aims to keep the community satisfied. Indeed, this community would support the government because all of its needs are met. Unlike to the past, nowadays private sector has proliferated and a vast number of big corporations are belonged to affluent individuals rather than government. Evidently, the owner of companies do not care about welfare of the people and just think of their own profit. Therefore, workers and employees are not supported by their employer because they can easily be substituted by other job applicants.
It is fair to conclude that nowadays people struggle to find a secure job, while in the past it was easy. This is because people had fewer choices in the past and were persistent in their job, and because government would support the people in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site Use specific reasons and examples to 76
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 70
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 850, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ce and gain skill in a single activity. As a result lack of experience prevent peo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90023752969 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74945516904 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477434679335 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.100973879 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.578947368 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1578947368 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210759237578 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775346345645 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643558946107 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150681118579 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573985035342 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.