Should governments make decisions about people's lifestyle, or should people make their own decisions?
One of the major tasks of the government is that the government has to keep the country organized and peaceful. Some people believe that the government should intervene in people's way of life by making decisions on behalf of their residents. I halfly agree with this statement because this method has both advantages and drawbacks which I will list below.
To begin with, the government can control the country better with strategy. As the most powerful organization in the country, the government always wants good things for their citizens. This means that the government will suggest what the citizens should do so as to benefit their life. Not all people are literate enough to be well-behaved or polite with others; therefore, through laws, the government is likely to adjust citizens’ behaviors or manners for a good purpose. Furthermore, with this process, the government can prevent people who are inclined to do bad behavior such as robbing or killing people. Hence, forming a citizen's lifestyle in the long term can effectively form a society without criminals, which can be achieved through direct intervention from the government.
On the other hand, despite the aforementioned benefits, there is a downside when the government controls people’s lifestyle. It is unjust for citizens who have a good attribute to follow the government rule due to some bad pattern in a society. If people cannot live the life they want, they might not develop all of their potential. For example, normally people can develop their potential by experiencing many different challenging cases; however, due to government rule of lifestyle, they might not find and reach their potential. This means that people cannot become their best version although they might be. Even more serious is that the government can receive some opposition from people who are not satisfied with the rules. This could deteriorate the governmental organizations making them unmanageable.
In conclusion, forming a good lifestyle for citizens is a good move. Nevertheless, sometimes the government should place itself in the citizens’ perspective.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Some people think that only the politicians can make significant changes in society while others think that individuals can have a lot of influence What is your opinion 76
- Schools are the only place to receive true education Do you agree or disagree 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 258, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ill suggest what the citizens should do so as to benefit their life. Not all people are ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 629, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...ing or killing people. Hence, forming a citizens lifestyle in the long term can effectiv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...develop their potential by experiencing many different challenging cases; however, due to gove...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3244047619 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91211835597 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0147201283 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3888888889 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310293181015 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102218867486 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107053885713 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197004385433 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804633213188 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.