taking a lot of time to make an important decision is viewed as a bad quality for a person to have. but now it is considered as a good quality
There are several decisions that people are required to make every day, ranging from dealing with trivial things, like what to wear or eat in every morning, to significant affairs, including choosing a job or running a policy. The time spent on making different decisions varies greatly. From my perspective, when it comes to make an important decision, it is a desirable quality that people take a lot of time on it.
As for students, making an significant decision meticulously can ensure a promising future development for them. As a matter of fact, the most importance thing for students is to choose a university or a major, both of which can exert a heavy influence on their future. For one thing, the university they choose can affect the development of their personalities because its professors and students there can help to mold their characters; for another thing, a major they choose would determine what positions they can do in the future. In this case, by taking a meticulous consideration, it enables them to choose a university or major that can best meet their needs and thus to succeed in the future. My personal experience can be a compelling example to shed more light on this. When I was a freshman, the most important thing for me was to choose a major. However, I was unsure and hesitant to choose a major. I took a long time to think what majors could best satisfy my interests and what positions I could fill in with that major. After a long time thinking, I decided computer science as my major because I was interested in designing games and Computer Science could definitely help to design a game more effectively and have a job related with my interest. Had it not been for the long-time consideration about my major, I could never fill in the positions as game designers.
As for workers, taking a lot of time can be beneficial for them since it can help them to have a satisfying life. Indeed, what is of vital importance for workers is to fill in a desirable position. In order to make such a decision, a worker definitely needs to surf the Internet to search for the information about their positions, such as the salary, the location of the company, the content of the daily work, etc. Not until they have a comprehensive understanding about their jobs can they make a huge decision. My friend’s experience can be a compelling example of this. When he graduated from university, he wanted to had a job with high salary while flexible working hours. Hence, he first searched for all the positions that could satisfy his needs in the website. And then, he compared each position’s pros and cons. Eventually, he chose to be a programmer in Google since not only could he get paid well, but also he could work flexibly as long as he could finish the project on time.
In a nutshell, taking a lot of time to make a decision is a good quality for people in different stages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-05 | Storyline | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Storyline | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Storyline | 88 | view |
| 2020-05-18 | mohamad247 | 92 | view |
| 2018-05-26 | Mehrdad.imn | 85 | view |
- It s difficult for teachers to be both popular well liked and effective in helping students learn Agree or disagree 89
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is viewed as a bad quality for a person to have but in fact it s a good quality for a person to have 88
- You may choose between two professors who will be teaching a course that you must take at your university If the following statements are the only information available to you about the differences between the two professors which professor would you choo 73
- Which one of the following do you think is the most important thing that parents should teach their children Being helpful to others Being honest Being well organized 90
- t a sale at a private home in California several years ago a man purchased a box of photographic negatives stored in envelopes negatives are photographic images on film or glass from which actual photographs can be made The negatives dated from the 1920s 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...time on it. As for students, making an significant decision meticulously can e...
^^
Line 3, column 1386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill in the positions as game designers. As for workers, taking a lot of time can...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, well, while, another thing, as for, as to, such as, as a matter of fact, for another thing, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2403.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66601941748 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77934831859 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450485436893 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5246450207 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.47826087 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3913043478 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91304347826 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237573598538 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827160842059 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103163850651 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226592266434 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131854079682 0.0645574589148 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...time on it. As for students, making an significant decision meticulously can e...
^^
Line 3, column 1386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill in the positions as game designers. As for workers, taking a lot of time can...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, well, while, another thing, as for, as to, such as, as a matter of fact, for another thing, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2403.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66601941748 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77934831859 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450485436893 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5246450207 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.47826087 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3913043478 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91304347826 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237573598538 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827160842059 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103163850651 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226592266434 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131854079682 0.0645574589148 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.