In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
I accede to the statement that fewer cars will be in use in twenty years than today. Since the society is developing rapidly and the technology is growing at a staggering rate, more innovative ways are likely to replace the use of cars. Besides, the current problems of cars can prevent residents from steering them, like the increasing gas fee, the CO2 emission, etc.
To begin with, people may prefer alternative ways to go out instead of driving cars. For instance, people may take the bus or the subway for the sake of saving money. Nowadays, the subway and bus system in China becomes pretty mature. So it is very convenient to go out by subway or by bus. What's more, traditional cars can give way to state-of-the-art products, such as aerocrafts or other vehicles we have never imagined. It is probable that new products can tremendously facilitate our travels. Consequently, cars will be prone to be replaced by these new vehicles.
Secondly, cars can bring potential problems, undermining the environment and jeopardizing our health. It is universally acknowledged that cars emit CO2 and SO2, which exerts negative influence on the atmosphere, aggravating the greenhouse effect.Except that, these gases can pollute the air we breathe, which is like an invisible 'killer'. Given the fact that people are paying more attention to their health, they will probably use less cars for the sake of healthier life.
And there exist other problems the use of cars gives rise to. More cars means more traffic jam, which is annoying when one is commuting between the workplace and home.
With regard to that, governments have put forward some policies to limit the number of cars in some provinces of China, like Beijing and Shanghai. Hence I believe similar policies will appear everywhere to limit the car use. Besides, the car-related incidences can surge with the increasing use of cars. And car incidences can be horrible. In view of all these deficiencies of cars, it is likely that car use will reduce in the future.
In conclusion, cars do bring us a lot of convenience, but given the problems it brings about, it is unlikely that the use of cars will soar in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asing gas fee, the CO2 emission, etc. To begin with, people may prefer alterna...
^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...nvenient to go out by subway or by bus. Whats more, traditional cars can give way to ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to be replaced by these new vehicles. Secondly, cars can bring potential probl...
^^^^
Line 9, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Except
...here, aggravating the greenhouse effect.Except that, these gases can pollute the air w...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 432, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...to their health, they will probably use less cars for the sake of healthier life. ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cars for the sake of healthier life. And there exist other problems the use o...
^^^^
Line 15, column 148, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...es of China, like Beijing and Shanghai. Hence I believe similar policies will appear ...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at car use will reduce in the future. In conclusion, cars do bring us a lot of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93783783784 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76329378628 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556756756757 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3528421093 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.619047619 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370918996359 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118509514287 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176553767342 0.0737576698707 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188063455581 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106387707844 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.