When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Nowadays,due to the fierce competition in modern society,teachers attach greater importance to adapting measures to provide students with higher quality of education.Some people may claim that students who are asked to work alone on projects are able to learn more effectively. However, my view is that assigning projects on which students must work together is a wiser choice.
To begin with, assignments which require teamwork are able to attract students\'s attention and inspire their learning interest. Supposing that a teacher asks students to do an extremely difficult project alone, thus lacking the interaction within students, it is easier for students to feel bored and dull and lose some interest and even lose confidence. Hence, they are likely to give up on this project and are likely to hate that subject. Also, working together draws students\' attention so that they would participate in it actively, including listening carefully and thinking positively and creatively, which creates a constructive learning atmosphere in class. Furthermore, it gives the teachers more inspiration when they receive students feedback in the projects. In this way, teachers are able to make some adjustments in time in order to enhance the quality of teaching. Consequently, there is every reason to believe that working together renders students more motivated and engaged in the class.
Working together is really imperative for students in order to master more solid knowledge and skills. When students are confronted with some difficult problems, they can discuss them together and learn from each other\'s different perspectives, which can motivate students to challenge themselves and inspire their interest in digging into more complex knowledge. Only in this way can the students cope with and comprehend difficult points in study more effectively. Also, discussion in the process of finishing projects is conducive to enhancing students teamwork so that they learn how to communicate and cooperate with each other, which paves the way for their future development. As a result, it is due to discussion that they could have a command of more knowledge and skills.
From what has been discussed above, I draw a conclusion that it is necessary for teachers to assign projects on which students must work together instead of work alone because teamwork is beneficial for inspiring learning interests and solidly mastering knowledge and skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , due
Nowadays,due to the fierce competition in modern soc...
^^^^
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , teachers
...the fierce competition in modern society,teachers attach greater importance to adapting m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
...udents with higher quality of education.Some people may claim that students who are ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...do an extremely difficult project alone, thus lacking the interaction within stud...
^^
Line 9, column 712, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... development. As a result, it is due to discussion that they could have a comman...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, really, so, thus, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47894736842 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89973730781 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518421052632 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3792375664 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.8 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461016195779 0.236089414692 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164513991286 0.076458572812 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825145120301 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308547190854 0.150856017488 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428894297658 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.