Why people are more willing to help unknown people that in the past
Perhaps no subject in the world is as likely to cause so much controversy as economical gap between diffrent people does. An issue in dispute is that whether people are more willing to help people they don't know as time passes. Some people advocates that due to individualism people tend to be more selfcentered and mean, while the opponents suggest that there are some indications in our modern civilization that show people are more generous now. In my opinion, these days people are more inclined to help people they don't know than in the past for two reasons.
First and foremost, because of the scientific and technological advancements after the industrial revolution humans can supply their basic needs in a more efficient way. For example, my grandfather states that when he was child, he lived in an agricultural society that works would we done by humans and animal physical power. So, they had to work from dawn to dusk to provide their food themselves and the result was only sufficeint for his family, so there were no surplus to be distributed to other people. However, with idvention of machine, and chemical fertilizer abundant amount of food and other commodities were produced and manufactured with less physical effort. As a result, the human now have more than they need, so they can help others much more. For instance, every year me and my family collect the clothes that we don't need and give them away to the people in need. Moreover, there is a growing tradition that people leave the equipments they no longer want such as refrigerators, ovens, bedroom items and etc on the streets, for the poeple in need. Similiarly, with the invent of the internet there are some websites that you can give away the food that are going to spoil to the others for free before it become unusable. Consequently, there are more opportunities now to help unknown people that were in the past.
Secondly, with emergence of modern societies, new govermental and private institutions were established that their purpose is to maintain the welfare of all the human kind and to decrease the gap between poor rand rich. For example, FAO is a global institution that helps people and countries around the world to supply their water and food in a sustainable way. In fact, it develops many programs to teach undeveloping counteries like those in Africa how to cultivate and harvest the most efficient plants and how to raise the best livestocks without harming enviromental sources like water and jungles as much as possible. There are also many humanetrian private institutions that help people to provide their basic needs such as food, water, education and etc. That's why I'm positive that in modern times helping others got easier.
From what has been discussed above, one can reach a conclusion that due to the technological and scientific advancements after industrial revolution and establishments of various philantrophic govermental and private institutions, thesedays people are more willing and capable of helping unknown people than before. Finally I suggest governments should introduce incentives like loweing the paying tax for the institutions that have humanetrian aims.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | fmichela | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-12 | Alia Mahbob | 60 | view |
| 2021-12-24 | Seilcaty | 70 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | Tina-Poorbaghi | 83 | view |
- Essential Information 73
- Why people are more willing to help unknown people that in the past 73
- Why today rules are appropriate for young people 90
- why requiring students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade on the project is beneficial 73
- Why Governments should provide free internet access to people 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...le are more willing to help people they dont know as time passes. Some people advoca...
^^^^
Line 1, column 521, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e are more inclined to help people they dont know than in the past for two reasons. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 833, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d my family collect the clothes that we dont need and give them away to the people i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1086, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...or the poeple in need. Similiarly, with the invent of the internet there are some websites...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sustainable way" with adverb for "sustainable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...he world to supply their water and food in a sustainable way. In fact, it develops many programs to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 756, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ic needs such as food, water, education and etc. Thats why Im positive that in modern ti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 765, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...such as food, water, education and etc. Thats why Im positive that in modern times he...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 775, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...od, water, education and etc. Thats why Im positive that in modern times helping o...
^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... of helping unknown people than before. Finally I suggest governments should introduce ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2670.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 526.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07604562738 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79002483932 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51711026616 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 839.7 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3427333378 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399079349513 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131330773736 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146095345118 0.0737576698707 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257632690787 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134844437819 0.0645574589148 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.