Cure of Malaria
Both the reading passing and lecture discusses about the possible solutions for elimination of the notorious malaria disease. Whilst the author suggests that, there are three reasonable strategies to carry out the particular task, the speaker challenges the propositions made by author. In his opinion, none of the methods will be efficacious for several reasons which will be discussed in the following paragraphs.
The author, in the reading, begins by mentioning that the treatment can be carried out effectively by evaluating the strain types of malaria ( as different countries have different strain types) with the medicine for each of the types; however, the lecturer refutes the claim, made by author. He argues that there are not medicines or drugs that cure malaria, rather it is use for treatment of the malaria. Futher, he asserts some strain of the malaria are strongly resistant to the particular drugs showing no any effect to them. Therefore, it completely falsifies the authors claim.
The writer further asserts that two methods: sparying chemical and usgae of the fish can be effective to kill the mosquitoes, who transfer parasite to humans, in different stages. The speaker is at odds with the authors position. He maintains that it will be impropbale to reach the widespread areas of the mosquitos either through spraying chemical or usage of fishes: they are highly capable of flying. Thus, only few mosquitoes will be destroy which will certainly not solve the problem.
The reading article, finally, proposes the application of sterile insects-- insects made infertile made by the imposing low-level gamma rays, as the possible solution measures. It inhibits the female to hatch the eggs ultimately reducing the population of mosquito. As opposed to the articles opinion, the lecturer argues that it is seen the female mosquitoes are highly reluctant to mate with the sterilized male, for unknown reasons. Thus, he adds that employing sterlized insects will not have efficacious output as the females with look after the unsterlized male for mating and hatching occurs giving birth to number of mosquitoes.
To summarize, the writer and speaker holds the opposite views on the possible mesures for harmful malaria disease which will be difficult for them on finding common ground.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend money on salaries university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Communal Online and Traditional Printed Encyclopedia 80
- Use of Buildings 80
- Voynich Manuscript 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y evaluating the strain types of malaria as different countries have different st...
^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...sistant to the particular drugs showing no any effect to them. Therefore, it compl...
^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
...pulation of mosquito. As opposed to the articles opinion, the lecturer argues that it is...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1373.03311258 142% => OK
No of words: 367.0 270.72406181 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30790190736 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.675635552 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 145.348785872 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555858310627 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 419.366225166 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7276553252 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9375 7.06452816374 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144655231018 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527164915531 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114336930049 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798187187209 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947678261261 0.0443174109184 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 63.6247240618 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.