Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible.
The article states that some of the scientists believe it's possible for a human to survive on Mars or the Moon but Venus has not a suitable condition for lives and it is inhospitable so human presence there probably impossible, however, the professor refutes each of the author's ideas.
First, the reading claims that at Venus' surface atmospheric pressure is much greater than the pressure at Earth's surface so it crushed everything, and humans cant land on it. The professor refutes this point by saying that, 50 km up in the atmosphere is equal to the normal pressure human beings are used to on Earth, Therefore, there would be no danger of the station getting crushed.
Second, the article posits that evidence shows that there are no water and oxygen available on Venus' surface. However, the professor says that water and oxygen can be produced through a chemical process and as we know there are carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere. As a result, there is no need to import water and oxygen that are essential for human survival.
Finally, the reading passage claims that only a little sunlight could reach Venus's surface and 60% of the sunlight is blocked out or reflected. The professor opposes this point by explaining that the clouds are not very thick and the sunlight is still abundant 50 kilometers above the surface. Humans can aggregate the filtered and reflected sunlight to generate enough electricity to power up the station.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
The article states that some of the scientists believe its possible for a h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ce so it crushed everything, and humans cant land on it. The professor refutes this ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gh electricity to power up the station.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, so, still, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92712550607 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5353117626 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558704453441 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.7733508646 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.222222222 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4444444444 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221754305493 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763920407676 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864096271752 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130950265181 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101373109682 0.0443174109184 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.