Summary
The main idea of both reading and lecture is about one of the famous animal that calls Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that live alongside the dinosaurs. With this mind, the author points out that several arguments have been made to oppose their power flight and these animals could not able to fly. The lecture refutes this claim, casting doubt on every single point made by the author.
First, Pterosaur were kinds of Cool-blood animal and this animal have a slow metabolism. Thus, they were unable to produce enough energy for the fly. On the other hand, the professor brings up the idea that based on the recent research Pterosaurs capable of flight. According to the fossils, which remain of the animals they had warm-blooded and this type of metabolism was able to go faster and produce enough energy.
Second, the reading asserts that there is a limit to the weight of animals that can be kept airborne by powered flight. In contrast, the speaker underlines the idea that Pterosaurs had special kind of solid bone and this situation provided them to able to fly.
Finally, the reading passage argues that all animals with powered flight are able to take off from the ground. For instance, birds can take off with jumping by their legs but Pterosaur unable to flight by their legs. Conversely, the speaker dismisses the idea due to the fact that modern animals like Pterosaurs able to flight by push up body from the ground rather than their back.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m the ground rather than their back.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, second, so, thus, for instance, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81640625 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23647396495 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5546875 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8086836405 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.