TOEFL Writing Test - Test 1 (2022)
both the reading and the lecture discuss about online graduate programs. The passage argues that online courses fail to provide assistant from professors, to offer high standard contents as well as to get top school involved. The lecturer, on the other hand, disagree with these claims. He points out what the reading mentions are not totally true and support his ideas with three reasons.
First, the reading emphasizes the importance of interaction between students and professors conventional graduate programs provides. Unlike the traditional programs, the online ones, according to the reading, cannot provide opportunities for students to get accquaintance with their professors or have insightful communication with them outside of classrooms.Instead of considering the outside-classroom interactoin as the previliges of the traditional schools, the lecturer, however, states that it is merely students' preference and can be achieved in the online programs as well. In these programs, specifically, students who prefer to contact school faculty members can always do so via email or telephone.
Second, the reading pinpoints that traditional graduate programs are better than the online ones, in which courses neither hard nor meet a high criteria. Without challenges or a high standard, as mentioned by the reading, the online programs are taken less serious by both students and faculty members. The lecturer, in contrast, disapproves of the reading and argues that the online courses are made as the same standard as the traditional ones by professors and provides more challenges for students. Regarding the challenges, students among twenty online programs, who serviced by the lecturer, reveal that the online programs they take are more difficult compaired to the traditional ones as they have to put extra effort on self discipline and time management if they keep concentrating on screen.
Last, the reading asserts that taking online programs is not an option for ambitious students as these programs are only offered in ordinary universities instead of the ivy or other prestigious ones. Despite famous schools might offer a few online courses, to earn a degree from them, students are still required to take classess on campus. Contrary to the reading, the lecturer claims that top universities do offer online programs for students to earn a degree, not just a few credits. The ivy leagues except princeton, for example, provides entire online programs for students to graduate. The same goes for many other top universities too. Even in princeton, many online courses are more than a few to be chosen from.
- Is progress always good 90
- TOEFL Writing Test Test 1 2022 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to make friends with people who can have fun with us than to make friends with people who can help us when we are in need 90
- The government wants to make investment to improve education Which one of the following investments do you think is the best 86
- Critics say that current voting systems used in the United States are inefficient and often lead to the inaccurate counting of votes Miscounts can be especially damaging if an election is closely contested Those critics would like the traditional systems 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
both the reading and the lecture discuss abo...
^^^^
Line 6, column 359, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Instead
...ication with them outside of classrooms.Instead of considering the outside-classroom in...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...ch courses neither hard nor meet a high criteria. Without challenges or a high standard,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, well, as to, for example, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 1373.03311258 163% => OK
No of words: 410.0 270.72406181 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44634146341 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94112868702 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 145.348785872 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49512195122 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 419.366225166 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 2.5761589404 427% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.0988584187 49.2860985944 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.352941176 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1176470588 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 63.6247240618 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.