Your friend plans to reduce his living expense. He has following three options
1. Find a roommate to share the room to reduce costs
2. Buy fewer expensive electronic devices, like smart phones
3. Cook more at home (buy fewer expensive food items and not go to restaurants
which do you recommend? Why?
Facing with heavy inflation which increases the cost of living, an increasing number of people make decisions to cut their living budget: Some people choose to curtail the expense for housing; some people prefer to cut down expenses of electronic products; some people are predisposed to reduce the expense for food. From my perspective, budget cuts on electronic devices is a desirable option.
First, finding another roommate won’t reduce the living expense at all. Granted, the rent for an apartment can be reduced since another one can share the bills paid for the fixed rent cost. However, other fees can be created when a new roommate move to the house: another roommate will also use the kitchens or bathrooms in their routine life, which might double the fees for electricity or water. Meanwhile, the money paid for daily maintenance will also be increased. All these fees will easily cancel out the saved rent cost.
Second, the budget won’t be cut down by cooking more at home. Granted, purchasing ingredients and then processing them at home can save money since usually the price of food bought in restaurants is higher than the raw materials, given the fact that it includes operating cost and processing cost. However, simply buying less expensive items will cause some healthy problems, which might create another spending. In fact, cheaper food ingredients are less healthier than other expensive ingredients and thus people who consume them are more likely to contract healthy problems, like obesity, diabetes, etc. As a result, they tend to pay for some medicine or medical treatments in order to cure themselves. In this case, saved money can be canceled out.
Compared with the two former options, spending less money on electronic devices is more viable and effective in reducing the expense. As a matter of fact, the electronic devices keep updated quickly, which can impose a heavy economic burden on people who desire to buy many of them. Additionally, those latest devices are not indispensable to our daily life in that the services brought by them are almost the same as those old and cheaper electronic products. Take Apple, a company that produces electronic devices as an example, Apple always updates their products quickly, launching the newest version of Iphone every year. As those products are put on sales, they are costly since oceans of people are fanatical about it, which drags their price to rise. If people always pay for those latest versions of Iphone, they have to bear the high price as well as the heavy economic burden on their budget. However, despite the lighter weight and charming appearances, the services provided by the latest version of Iphone resemble the former version of Iphone and smart phones of other brands which are much cheaper. In this case, keeping old phones or purchasing other less money-consuming phones can help to save money considerably while does not exert an influence on people’s life.
In conclusion, in terms of how to curtail the living expense, buying less expensive electronic products should be prioritized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 452, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less healthy'?
Suggestion: less healthy
.... In fact, cheaper food ingredients are less healthier than other expensive ingredients and th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2608.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13385826772 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53938839034 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505905511811 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 813.6 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0779570659 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.545454545 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95454545455 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229728354116 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069499273395 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667121510151 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139697822686 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032075028532 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.