The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by FlorinHF on Wed, 07/27/2016 - 04:58

The table illustrates the percentage of different types of poor families from Australia. Figures are presented for 1999.
Overall, 11% of entire households had less resources than they needed. Figures reveal that the most increased percentage of poverty in Australia, 21%, was in families formed by only one parent, while only 48.000 (4%) of elderly couples confronted this issue. It can be noticed that only 54 000 ( 6%) single aged people lived in poverty, closely followed by couples with no children with a percentage of 7. When it comes about the number of people, the most increased figure of those affected by scarcity is represented couples with children, even though the percentage is only 12% of the families. The second most increased number of people affected by scarcity are those who live single. 19% of them do not live in proper life sustainable conditions.
In 1999, in Australia, approximately two million people did not have proper living conditions.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-07-07 Tran Thu 61 view
2016-12-04 Thien 61 view
2016-07-27 FlorinHF 84 view
2016-07-25 FlorinHF 84 view
2015-03-31 nundc 80 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user FlorinHF :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tage of different types of poor families from Australia. Figures are presented fo...
^^
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssue. It can be noticed that only 54 000 6% single aged people lived in poverty, ...
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'second', 'so', 'while']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247252747253 0.268076937826 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.142857142857 0.116061578633 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0769230769231 0.0759168565197 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0659340659341 0.0366838410393 180% => OK
Pronouns: 0.021978021978 0.0131127313244 168% => OK
Prepositions: 0.175824175824 0.155750635184 113% => OK
Participles: 0.043956043956 0.0379272487307 116% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73927823508 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0 0.0210936926555 0% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0714285714286 0.0948980150116 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00549450549451 0.00437022459523 126% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010989010989 0.00967000014798 114% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 970.0 1161.00487805 84% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.9 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.13924050633 5.90752243213 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73763899035 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.405063291139 0.337110787985 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.29746835443 0.247514529752 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208860759494 0.171178102325 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.145569620253 0.112407865282 130% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73927823508 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645569620253 0.546246751206 118% => OK
Word variations: 61.0625193717 49.3433353143 124% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.5555555556 23.0094962315 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0792368759 42.9750493124 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 135.714022679 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 23.0094962315 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.444444444444 0.689975730869 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.48048780488 135% => OK
Readability: 47.3023909986 47.7609492067 99% => OK
Elegance: 2.02380952381 2.94281807926 69% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403376468457 0.418131533498 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.172441461602 0.181151798455 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.150304549439 0.0850326197045 177% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.567081614561 0.706616315825 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.23278108818 0.157042692854 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172954746291 0.228904883108 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109877898979 0.108899403657 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.21547446093 0.367819155151 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0883325672087 0.0812612215331 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281660913274 0.316326947829 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693613034372 0.0921553760075 75% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70731707317 54% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.14146341463 263% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.08536585366 98% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.16585365854 63% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 0.956097560976 314% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 7.1512195122 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.