tpo17
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the claim of harm to the United States birds. While the reading part lists some facts as negative side-effects of human expansion on the Birds; however, the professor counters these specific points. She mentions to some clues to call into the question for the information in the text.
First of all, the professor refutes the fact that the increment of people settlements demolishes the whole birds' habitats. However, in the lecture this fact is nominated as one of threatens for the birds and their habitats. As the lecturer states, even though, the urbanism destroys some birds' habitats, it provides a better condition for other birds. For instance, in the city, there is an appropriate condition for pigeon, the existence of pigeon in cities pave the path for others birds, which prey on the pigeon. Consequently, as the urban life furnishes the sufficient situation for some types of birds, they shape new ecological chain.
Next, the passage mentions to agriculture activities as another fear factor for the birds' habitat; inasmuch as, the requirement for more crops leads to the further destroying of birds’ habitats. On the other hand, the professor asserts that the advancement of agriculture technics is underestimating in this paragraph. Based on the lecturer acclaims, today, in the United States the land demand for the cultivation is declining day by day. Moreover, in the future the crops fertility will enhance; in this condition, they will be capable of producing more crop pre unit of land.
Finally, meanwhile, the reading passage presumes that the usage of pesticides leads to the determination of birds or the decrement their successful reproducing; the professor casts doubt on the accuracy of this hypothesis. As she asserts, although the old pesticides owned the toxic substance which was dangerous for the birds, nowadays scientist are aware of this footprint of pesticides. Thus, they produce the pesticides which in less toxic than previous ones. Besides, in the cultivation, the farmers use the crops which are pest-resistance. Hence, there is no requirement of the toxic pesticide.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-29 | heartqq | 80 | view |
| 2020-03-01 | eeemmmyyy | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | sahar90o | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | aldovega0516 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Mostafa93106325 | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 50
- 1 Some people believe that competition for high grades motivates students to excel in the classroom Others believe that such competition seriously limits the quality of real learning Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns wit 78
- 1.1.The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire vi 42
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Programs made in one's own country are more interesting than those made in other countries. 80
- 1.In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...tivities as another fear factor for the birds habitat; inasmuch as, the requirement f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'crops'' or 'crop's'?
Suggestion: crops'; crop's
...day by day. Moreover, in the future the crops fertility will enhance; in this conditi...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'for instance', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.306532663317 0.261695866417 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.100502512563 0.158904122519 63% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0653266331658 0.0723426182421 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0226130653266 0.0435111971325 52% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0201005025126 0.0277247811725 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.150753768844 0.128828473217 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0175879396985 0.0370669169778 47% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.87749239118 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0150753768844 0.0208969081088 72% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.160804020101 0.128158765124 125% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00502512562814 0.0158828679856 32% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0100502512563 0.0114777025283 88% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2176.0 1645.83664459 132% => OK
No of words: 347.0 271.125827815 128% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27089337176 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.04852973271 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363112391931 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.299711815562 0.287516216867 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.250720461095 0.187439937562 134% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.172910662824 0.113142543107 153% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87749239118 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553314121037 0.539623497131 103% => OK
Word variations: 60.6892812953 53.8517498576 113% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.4117647059 21.7502111507 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9406124056 49.3711431718 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 132.220823453 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 21.7502111507 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.823529411765 0.878197800319 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 50.3829462621 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 3.31578947368 1.90840788429 174% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.612760844998 0.549887131256 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.138655167599 0.142949733639 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0495083363007 0.0787303798458 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.651978933207 0.631733273073 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0844818820185 0.139662658121 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.304994022496 0.266732575781 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071804577405 0.103435571967 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.614000550834 0.414875509568 148% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0405977194372 0.0530846634433 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.488215000067 0.40443939384 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240808881308 0.0528353158467 46% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.