The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Freedonia.
The given graphs provide data on the workforce in six different professions in the republic of Freedonia in 1975 and 1995. As is observed, the graphs illustrate the progress of empowering women in the work market over the twenty years, even the number of females exceeded the number of males in some work fields.
In 1975, the number of employed men was considerably higher compared to the number of women in all sectors, in particular, manufacturing, finance and banking and public sector (defence). By 1995 there was a significant increase in the number of working females in communication, finance and marketing and wholesale and retail trade, where the number of employed women in these sectors was around 250, 120 and 550 out of thousands respectively and it rose by approximately 300 out of thousand in each sector. Taking into consideration the number of women surpassed the number of men in communication and wholesale and retail sectors, it is evident that women empowerment in employment sectors in Freedonia had significantly progressed in the given period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | xgracetangx | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Adeola Nafisat | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | kalkipriya Muruganantham | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | NeutronnzZ | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Nishanthini Jegatheesan | 67 | view |
- Every year several langauges die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. 67
- Number of people on London underground. 84
- Countires are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or a negative development. 67
- The graphs show average temperature and rainfall in two places in South Africa 74
- In many countries there is a shortage of suitable people for essential jobs.What do you think are the causes of this problem and what measures could be taken to solve it? 84
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'so', 'in particular']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.280423280423 0.268076937826 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.10582010582 0.116061578633 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0687830687831 0.0759168565197 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.026455026455 0.0366838410393 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.010582010582 0.0131127313244 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.201058201058 0.155750635184 129% => OK
Participles: 0.042328042328 0.0379272487307 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.0392247866 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00529100529101 0.0210936926555 25% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.111111111111 0.0948980150116 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00529100529101 0.00967000014798 55% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1067.0 1161.00487805 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.9 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.13218390805 5.90752243213 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73763899035 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.408045977011 0.337110787985 121% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287356321839 0.247514529752 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212643678161 0.171178102325 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149425287356 0.112407865282 133% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0392247866 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545977011494 0.546246751206 100% => OK
Word variations: 46.5120249531 49.3433353143 94% => OK
How many sentences: 5.0 8.93414634146 56% => OK
Sentence length: 34.8 23.0094962315 151% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7850282623 42.9750493124 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 213.4 135.714022679 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.8 23.0094962315 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.689975730869 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.84146341463 52% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 63.5356321839 47.7609492067 133% => OK
Elegance: 3.66666666667 2.94281807926 125% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.628937816036 0.418131533498 150% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.341901554516 0.181151798455 189% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0605834000643 0.0850326197045 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.832941169001 0.706616315825 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0448956840543 0.157042692854 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.459756575148 0.228904883108 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518148413814 0.108899403657 48% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.539513675797 0.367819155151 147% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0 0.0812612215331 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.558848363308 0.316326947829 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238300699835 0.0921553760075 26% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.08536585366 24% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 7.1512195122 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.