The best way to resolve the international enviromental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The international environment is big problem considered in many years. There are a lot of factors causing air pollution seriously. Besides, people concern on some effective ways to Some people think increasing the cost of fuel is the best solution to reduce air pollution. Others think it is not the best way because of some different ones.
I disagree with the statement that increasing the cost of fuel is the best solution to the environmental problems. The first reason is that the cost of fuel is not the only factor causing pollution but there are also intensive farming, over population. Actually, people do agriculture by destroying forest,thus, green trees are reducing in size. Otherwise, rising population day by day is one of the factors that causes environmental problems. In fact, people need place to live and work, which is why they cut down trees and no more fresh atmosphere. Secondly, Government and individual is the main factor having ability to decrease environmental issues. Furthermore, Government encourage each human to make life greener by conducting campaigns, education, television programs.
On the other hand, going up the cost of the fuel is one of the best solutions to decreasing pollution. For example, the number of individual transportation will declined if the cost of fuel is too high. As a result, carbon dioxide is less and less which means air contamination is resolved.
In conclusion, air pollution is the hottest issues needing to be attention significantly. Environmental problems is caused by many by factors such as the cost of fuel, intensive farming and human. Therefore, we have to solve this issues before becoming dangerous.
- the diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth 78
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 73
- The best way to resolve the international enviromental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 56
- Education for young people is important in many countries. However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who cannot read and write. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people concern on some effective ways to Some people think increasing the cost of...
^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , thus
...ople do agriculture by destroying forest,thus, green trees are reducing in size. Othe...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'encourages'.
Suggestion: encourages
...nmental issues. Furthermore, Government encourage each human to make life greener by cond...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'decline'
Suggestion: decline
...umber of individual transportation will declined if the cost of fuel is too high. As a r...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22509225092 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06397965018 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571955719557 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.0116564415 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.2941176471 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9411764706 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94117647059 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213417842262 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653763936663 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752832106942 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125788292568 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429386747746 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.