Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?
The potential of an over packaged product to attract the attention of customer by its glamour, for sure, is considerable but is it able to promote quality, durability and effectiveness of a product? My answer is no, therefore I feel the consumer should avoid buying these products as due to over packaging we can’t even evaluate the quality of the product which is possible while buying unpacked or appropriately packed substances.
The cause of this trend is paradoxically profit endowed and entrepreneurs are trapped in a self-enforcing circle to present their products in more sophisticated ways to enhance marketing and when they notice that the buyers easily get manipulated by just packing of the material, they start wrapping it in more than required material which, in turn, confuses the consumer, therefore, the purchaser must not spend exorbitant money to buy these goods.
As being citizens of this planet we have a paramount accountability for environment so buying these products will only cause more waste, which requires so many funds and efforts to dispose of; and in this century when we are fighting with world hunger, spending a lot of money just on packaging and disposal will cause downfall among farmers and small scale industries.
A laudable initiative to avoid these goods will amplify this notion among others which will lead to the downfall of enterprises who neglect quality of the product for just its external make over, and consumers will be able to receive them directly from small town factories whose products are even more efficient than those who are packed in glitters.
In short, consumers can change this unworthy trend of decorating a poor-quality product just to gain profit and popularity which will compel the entrepreneurs to create quality oriented goods.
- Global climate change is regarded as a severe problem. Who should take responsibilities governments, large companies or individuals? Please explain. 88
- Many young people get married before finishing their study and establishing a good job. To what extant do you agree? Please explain. 85
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 77
- Holdays tour tourism 85
- Global climate change is regarded as a severe problem. Who should take responsibilities governments, large companies or individuals? Please explain 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or appropriately packed substances. The cause of this trend is paradoxically...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xorbitant money to buy these goods. As being citizens of this planet we have...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while, i feel, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23287671233 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85939832027 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6551724138 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 48.0 20.5024630542 234% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.2612186824 50.4703680194 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 254.666666667 104.977214359 243% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 48.6666666667 20.9669160288 232% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177125471177 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105292340098 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727678864242 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102791894452 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895733920561 0.0609392437508 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.5 12.6369458128 218% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 22.76 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.0 10.9458128079 201% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.94827586207 196% => OK
gunning_fog: 21.2 10.3980295567 204% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 22.0 10.5123152709 209% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.