The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The three pie charts provided compare the amount of money which a particular school in the UK spent on education in 3 different years, in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, from 1981 to 2001, there was a fluctuation in all aspects except for an increase in insurance and the major expense was for teachers’ salaries, contrast to the minimum of insurance.
It is apparent from the data that by far the greatest spending was on teachers’ salaries, accounted for 40% in 1981, and this figure rose to a precisely a half in 1991, followed by a slight fall of 5% in 2001. It is interesting to note that the spending on resources had the similar trend throughout 3 periods of time, in 1981, 1991 and 2001, namely 15%, 20% and 9% respectively. In contrast, the money used for furniture and equipment showed a converse trend, with a dramatic fall from 15% in 1981 to 5% in 1991 and more than a forth times increase in size, from 5% in 1991 to 23% in 2001. The second largest proportion in 1981 was other workers’ salaries, namely 28% and it remained in the second place in 1991, however, it dropped to the third place in 2001, being nearly half as much in 1981. Apart from the fluctuate changes in all categories, the amount of money spent on insurance rose from 2% in 1981 to 3% in 1991 and 8% in 2001, yet it remained the least spending of the total spending.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-29 | Jonkun | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | trangh16688 | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-18 | goodluck0101 | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-18 | goodluck0101 | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-17 | mostafa abdulaziz | 73 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The bar chart below shows Scotland’s exports to the rest of the UK and the rest of the world for the year 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whe 67
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answer and in 89
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping 84
- Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation. 61
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are important in achieving happiness?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 818, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nearly half as much in 1981. Apart from the fluctuate changes in all categories, the amount o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, third, apart from, as for, except for, in contrast, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49397590361 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67670607411 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502008032129 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 20.2050710951 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 159.857142857 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.5714285714 22.9334400587 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7142857143 5.23603664747 262% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202761674588 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110158561118 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629516650843 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150710085726 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872144316465 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.