Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, the issue of student's project engendered copious controversies among people. Some people incline toward the opinion is that it is more beneficial for students to work together on projects. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that there are more benefits to work alone on projects. At my vantage point, when teachers assign projects, it is vital for them to work together and they can learn more. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason worth mentioning is that children can help each other in a group. When teachers define projects and students work together they can share and exchange their knowledge. For instance, a group of students who work on a project can talk about their idea and solution to finish the project precisely and by this way students' knowledge increase. Moreover, students can help each other in a group project. many students have a weakness in a special area and by working in a group, students can help each other to enhance their understanding in the flawed area. For instance, a person who has not a great background of math can increase his knowledge in math when work on a math project with a student who is expert in math and have a lot of information.
The second significant point supporting my idea is that in a group students have time to resolve their problem. A group of students are going to share their work and can end the project before deadline and since students finish early, they have spare time to solve their problem. But, when a student works alone on a project, it is an arduous task for him and because of the lack time, he cannot solve this problem. For example, a student who works alone on a hard project can finish his project near the deadline time and if he tries to solve his problems, he cannot present his project before the deadline time. Hence, he has to skip his problem and only attempt to finish his project.
To wrap it up, based on the aforementioned arguments, students by working in groups can exchange and improve their knowledge and solve their problem. Consequently, it is highly recommended that the teacher make a restrict role and force students work in groups. In fact, there are myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could be mentioned but is not embraced due to the dearth of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...can help each other in a group project. many students have a weakness in a special a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...t supporting my idea is that in a group students have time to resolve their problem. A g...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ighly recommended that the teacher make a restrict role and force students work in groups....
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, as to, for example, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79376498801 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60956671886 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460431654676 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7641494138 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.210526316 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9473684211 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325459823636 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119330834191 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712095746822 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212626868949 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414158334922 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.