How mass communication influence our lives especially the children. Discuss advantages and disadvantages.
In recent decades, there has been considerable debate regarding the mass communication and its effect on the people, especially children. I firmly concur with the opinion that the mass communication has advantages and disadvantages regarding its impact on children. The advantage is they can access the resources easily and learn better, but the disadvantage is children cannot concentrate on their study.
To begin with, the mass communication has a significant influence on the children such as accessing the resources easily, which is an advantage. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further internet and website and the ebooks. Subsequently, final results revealed that there is a highly complex relationship between the radio and television and papers and essays even though homework should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between children's books and easily accessible.
Furthermore, one of the disadvantages of the mass communication and its effect on children is its negative impact on the children's study because they cannot concentrate. For instance, a quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne University concerning the attention and the focus on the study. Hence, perhaps if the scientific research is significantly correlated with the efficiency of the teaching and acquiring the information, the preliminary findings will be closely associated with the concentration on their homework.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to believe that the mass communication has advantage and disadvantage on the people specifically children such as acquiring information and accessing to it and neglecting of the concentration on the study. Moreover, not only should national institutions endeavour to discern, but also they should be cognizant of the advanced technology and the mass communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-04 | ANKIT DEVANI | 72 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | viviana | 79 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | dilroop | 72 | view |
| 2019-06-12 | vj rajpoot | 72 | view |
| 2019-06-12 | vj rajpoot | 55 | view |
- People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face-to-face because of technology. What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole? 77
- TELEVISION SHOWS AND ITS IMPACT ON SOCIETY 77
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals & Society. To what extent do you agree? 85
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...n access the resources easily and learn better, but the disadvantage is children canno...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73648648649 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39024941389 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1858448928 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.5 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228148192966 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904208008016 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840664376778 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144976017054 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662659274914 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.