Developments in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is true that breakthroughs and innovations in technology contribute to different environmental problems. While some people argue that a simpler life is necessary to measure issues of the environment, I believe that using technology is the better way to deal with these problems.
On the one hand, when people live in a simple way, their demand for natural resources would be minimised as a certain result. For example, if workers commute from their home to their workplace by walking or cycling, the chances are exploiting oil or gas for private vehicles seems unnecessary. Similarly, if individuals get rid of their sedentary lifestyle such as watching TV for persistency hours and switch to participate in outdoor activities, electricity sources supplied for residential areas might be reduced to the basic level. As the use of natural resources declines, the fall of industrial wastes which are released by the process of consuming and exploiting are inevitable. These advantages of simplifying the life, therefore, would have dramatically positive impacts on the environment.
However, I am convinced that technology proves to be more effective in measuring environmental issues than other ways. The advancements in science areas will encourage people to use renewable power sources, such as solar energy or wind energy, instead of using traditional resources. Since the developments succeeded, they are more likely to be mass-produced to reduce the costs and raise the ability of competition in the market. Clean energies, as the result, would become popular and gradually replace the non-renewable resources. In other words, developing technology also help people to find sustainable sources and limit negative influences that old sources bring out without depleting human's basic needs.
In conclusion, although the reasons for adopting a simpler life are justifiable, I argue that using technology is a better choice to tackle with environmental issues but still meet the human's needs for energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-27 | Bao Ngoc Tho | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | baokhuyen759 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | lehonganh1212 | 89 | view |
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organizational rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 63
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 80
- People should look after their health for personal benefits rather than a duty for a society What extent do you agree or disagree 93
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land in sea. What are the reasons and solutions? 11
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a simple way" with adverb for "simple"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s. On the one hand, when people live in a simple way, their demand for natural resources wou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, still, therefore, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50322580645 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08958170121 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606451612903 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7721320174 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.230769231 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221129666599 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799105835082 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969300829244 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157971816866 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13409909443 0.056905535591 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.