independent essay TPO18
The reading mainly discusses about a type of overgreen tree which grows in the state of Florida and its name is Torreya taxifona, population of this tree is becoming extinct and it provides three solution to protecting this tree. On the other hand, in the listening, the professor does not agree with these reasons and he believes that htese methods are not satisfactory.
First of all, the article asserts that if Torreya reveals in the same erea for a long time, it will be find a btter microclimate on that region and can grow in the similar weather condition. On the contrary, the speaker refuses this idea and argues that htis way is not like to successful by changing climate due to we are observing global warming and soroundning this erea is warming and to be dried. Thus, the torreya needs to survive and its extinct dose not related to its climate condition.
In addition, the reading claims that by moving this tree to a new environment and location we can improve a growing its drasticaly. However, the speaker oposits that when a new specises coming to a new environment, it will be dangerous for that location and it is not predictable.
As a result, the passage states that for preserve and protect this tree, it is necessary to seeds and saplings its by research centers. While the professor rejects this view and he believes that research centers dont able to servive this tree due to they need more capacities and the Trroreya population not capable of many diseases for a long time.
- Do you agree or disagree?One of the best ways that parents can help their children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 76
- integrated essay-TPO46 80
- integrated essay -TPO 41 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 76
- Do you agree or disagree?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not related to its climate condition. In addition, the reading claims that by ...
^^
Line 6, column 213, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...w and he believes that research centers dont able to servive this tree due to they n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, thus, while, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 263.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73764258555 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60685697296 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536121673004 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.655497582 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.444444444 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2222222222 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 5.45110844103 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.