In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons.
Recently, the phenomenon of the ways of students’ assessment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the assessment of students by other methods are highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that other methods such as assessment in during course can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From teachers and parents standpoint, the assessment of students during course can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that total assessments, as well as correct assessments, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the effects of students’ assessment during term. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of total assessment and correct assessment apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of education systems, total assessment might increase the consequences of the examination of students. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the assessment of students related to this reality that the demerits of written examination pertain to one point for each student. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of practical experiences is correlated negatively with written examinations. It is correct to presume the preconceived notion of written examination method horizons.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of new methods indeed of written examination far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of assessment during term prove the significance of good assessment, but also pinpoint total assessment implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | njerime | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | kooshandehfar | 22 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | kooshandehfar | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | armimogh | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | armimogh | 85 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 85
- It is a foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. To what extent do you agree to disagree? 85
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 85
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pinpoint total assessment implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76258992806 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33840857181 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58273381295 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8757895943 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21926121801 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808627986018 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382290099907 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128772421352 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381165734443 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.