Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend by the prodigies discussing the influence of medial technology on human life expectancy. Some people think that advancment in medication has enhanced the human average life span, while others maintain that growth in medical technology is harmful for human life. This essay will discuss that how advacement in medical technology has ensued and is responsible for human’s life expectancy.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with the development of latest medical techniques to enhance the average human life span. Firstly, the most conspicuous is that with the advancement in medical arena, uncured and harmful diseases can now be fully addressed. For instance, early deaths caused by Tuberculosis, Hepatitis, Spinal cord, brain hamrige and many other diseases can now be cured, diagnosed and operated. As a matter of fact, it is quite evident that latest medical methodologies have not only provided cure but also enhanced human life expectancy.
On the other hand, proponents of the view that medicines are harmful and have resulted in decline of life expectancy are not cognizant with the goodies bestowed on humans by medicine. Prior to the advent of latest medical techniques children would die of cholera and other common diseases. Therefore, as an example, invention of morphine, polio and many common drugs has increased average life expectancy of a child. As a result, the importance of medical technology in enhancing human life cannot be overruled.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that the advent of latest medical technologies and medication is completely responsible for increase in average human life expectancy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | saeidazizi | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | a.aghyi1989 | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
- Some people follow interests have hobbies collection making things but some people think that it is pointless Why do people need hobbies How can they learn from hobbies 72
- wave farms 60
- In town and cities the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree 64
- Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? Support your point of view with details from your own 77
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...guments associated with the development of latest medical techniques to enhance the avera...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...humans by medicine. Prior to the advent of latest medical techniques children would die o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orphine, polio and many common drugs has increased average life expectancy of a c...
^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...ng discussion propounds that the advent of latest medical technologies and medication is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4776119403 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91644044355 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5877739238 50.4703680194 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35461644652 0.242375264174 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155014116055 0.0925447433944 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117654003801 0.071462118173 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26031505746 0.151781067708 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114901080454 0.0609392437508 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.