The means of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years. In your opinion, what are the positive and negative impacts of this change?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend by the prodigies discussing the transformation of communicational sources in the society. Some people believe that the different modes of communication bear positive impacts on the society, while others maintain that they have far more negative effects. This essay will discuss the positive and negative effects ensued on the society by the introduction of various means of communication.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with the advantages of advent of various communication media's in the society. The most conspicuous is that people with tht invention of mobile phones can easily communicate with their loved ones' in a matter of seconds. As an example, parents can communicate and have live video chat with their kids living in another country across the globe. As a matter of fact, new means of communication have changed the complete dynamics of society and led to more close relationship.
On the other hand, disadvantages of various modes of communication in the society cannot be sidelined. Firslty, the inundation and ubiquity of mobile phones has made it a basic commodity. Therefore, almost everyone with a mobile phone is too much invloved with this gadget and this scenario has resulted in lack of social interaction. For instance, students have become so much indulged with this mode of communication and are not only lacking social interactions but also facing physical problems. As a result, introduction of new means of communication has not only led to the lack of physical interaction amongst each other but also has resulted in a less social society.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that change in modes of communication bears positive as well as negative impacts in the society, however, with slight scrutinization the odds can be overcome.
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Environmental problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be managed at government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and / or examples from your own 77
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of studying the plays and theatrical arts which were written centuries ago? 11
- Human values are losing because of wealth-producing careers such as medicine? Do you agree or disagree? 55
- Problem and benefits for high school students studying play and work of theaters written centuries ago. Discuss and use your own examples. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2962962963 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10401189815 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52861952862 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0439520246 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.0 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203965268067 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780768241239 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621013278713 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139368003013 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421165267759 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.