Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing and bungee jumping? Explain your reasons
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “what are the reasons behind supporting these activities?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that sports like extreme skiing and bungee jumping are hazardous to health, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the medical standpoint, extreme sports are bound up inextricably with a satisfying rush of adrenalin, which indicates they lead to both reduced risk of heart attacks and keeping the blood flow. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between burning excess calories and strengthening muscles as well as an exponential increase in body strength. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of physical endurance is correlated positively with not only keeping fit but also building muscles.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, dangerous sports attribute to thrilling experiences, in that it would come down to rejuvenating the mind and having fun. A salient example of such attribution is the excitement of danger, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take an escape from every day routines for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint mental problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to building confidence, motivation, and even mental endurance. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of psychological benefits of dangerous activities.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that there are compelling reasons to support extreme sports. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 85 | view |
- Students in schools and university learns for more from lessons with their teachrs compared to other sources , such as television or the Internet . Do you agree or disagree ? 73
- Your local council is considering closing a sports and leisure center that it runs, in order to save money.Write a letter to the local council. In your letterGive details of how you and your friends or family use the centerexplain why the sports and leisu 87
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 88
- Some people think personal car is the best way to travel within cities, while others think bicycles are better.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...spects of that throughout this essay. From the medical standpoint, extreme spo...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eeping fit but also building muscles. Within the realm of psychology, without ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal benefits of dangerous activities. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... what elaborated above, I firmly believe that there are compelling reasons to sup...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, then, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19722796601 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 139.433497537 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683333333333 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.4287038098 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183874437376 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554301985056 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632671911184 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110118560921 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990581935601 0.0609392437508 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.