The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the US and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.
According to the figures provided, the line graph provided reveals how the conviction rate changed at various ages among different sexes expressed as percentages while the pie chart illustrates the proportions of prisoners in both genders in the UK.
It is obvious that the number of convicted criminals reached an all-time high during the adolescence in both sexes and more guilty verdicts were delivered for male criminals than female ones regardless of age. Moreover, a marked contrast between the number of male prisoners and that of female offenders can be easily seen from the pie chart.
Both the male and the female conviction rates began rising at the age of 10 with 2 and 0 percent respectively and climbed significantly during the puberty. The rates rocketed to the peaks of 16 and 5 percent by the age of 20, then going down constantly to the original 2 and 0 percent when 60-year old.
Men proven guilty were undoubtedly higher than women proven so over the whole range. However, the gap widened the most roughly by 11 percent, when offenders were in their early twenties and gradually narrowed down back with a 2-percent discrepancy at 60.
Men who were confined in jail accounts for 96 percent of prison population while only 4 percent of that is female. Surprisingly, there is a disproportion between the percentage difference of male/female convictions and that of male/female inmate turnover.
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 84
- The graph beside shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000. 73
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009. 84
- Given are two pie charts displaying the categories of the annual spending divided by families in Canada between 1972 and 2002. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0811965812 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85471684831 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606837606838 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5522406669 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.111111111 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29546365148 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117382551228 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746671336596 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158562080458 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724536831998 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.