Does video communication whit doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros and Cons?
Recently, the phenomenon of recent technologies such as video communication and their impacts on treatments of diseases has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that these advances can be highly beneficial, such issue regarded as thoroughly positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I will analyze the use of video communication by doctors to cure disease throughout this essay.
To begin whit, there are various reasons to support the innovation of using the online video conference to cure many diseases. This technology cannot help to treat any disease. However, video communication has helped to do many surgeons from a far distance. For example, they had some mine operations by video communication from a far away distance, the greatest Orology professors in advanced countries.
In addition, the doctors cannot to visit their patients physically in necessity times. But, they can become aware of the situation of their patients. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2017 has shown that a significant number of doctors in advanced countries visit their old patients by online facilities.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on curing disease whit video communication, I profoundly believe that this technology has helped greatly to treat patients whit low drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Jaskaransingh11 | 79 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | Prince Singh | 55 | view |
| 2018-06-17 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
- Nowadays many young people leave home at an early age to either study or work in another city Do you think this has more advantages or disadvantages for young people Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience 88
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn,and relearn” – Alvin Toffle. What do you understand from Alvin’s statement? Elaborate on your understanding and support your point of 67
- Some people prefer to spend their holidays in resorts where everything is organized for them and they take little interest in the country they are visiting. Others prefer to travel around the country and to see how the people live, to get to know their cu 79
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 61
- A company’s higher level authorities should get their employees’ inputs during decision-making processes. Discuss. Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of recent techn...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to cure disease throughout this essay. To begin whit, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...logy professors in advanced countries. In addition, the doctors cannot to visit...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir old patients by online facilities. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.5418719212 28% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 211.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58293838863 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12467873059 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60663507109 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1014585542 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.090909091 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343200403821 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123172833739 0.0925447433944 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088267060024 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195781015356 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683971943568 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.