In many parts of the world, there is continuous coverage of sport on television. Some people believe this discourages the young from taking part in any sport themselves.
Discuss this view and give your own opinion.
Some nations has seen a growth of sport programmes on their television channels for past decades. While some parents were perplexed by the notion that this change strays their children from participating any outdoor activities, which then impoverishes their well-being, I personally believe that these channels are driving, rather than precluding, our next generation to take part in these games. The reasons for my position are as follow.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that athelets in world-class championships comprise the impetus for youngsters to enter a playground. Intrinsically, living in formative years, people are impressionable to these vibrant men who are ceaselessly striving for being the winner. Therefore, the sportsmanship embodied by their beloved sport stars, coupled with a passion to act like an adult, is likely to impel the young audiences to seek chances conducting such similar agenda. Moreover, this ensuing incentive will further be flourished whenever the youngsters practice the skills perceived from their beloved sport stars.
Further and more importantly, though, sports are not likely to happen at home. Admittedly, most of the sports shown on television requires a venue with suitable facilities and peers for a successful game. One of these salient examples is the football game. With the aforementioned motivation, regardless to the formal establishment in the World-Cup, two teams of eleven players have to contend for a goal on football court occupying thousands square feet. Generally speaking, such prerequisites are not likely to be surmountable at home. Therefore, young football amateurs should leave home, and join a team themselves.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm that the sport programmes are beneficial to development of the young by advocating sportmanship and spirit of teamwork on the sport field, which in turn encourage them to take part in it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-11 | ok.me | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | alice465031 | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-13 | Richa Dhiman | 89 | view |
| 2019-03-01 | farrukh21 | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-02 | RockyGagKy | 84 | view |
- Many teachers assign homework to students every day. Do you think that daily homework is necessary for students?Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 89
- Some people think the schools should be more entertaining. Others do not think so. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 11
- Some people claim that there are more disadvantages of the car than its advantages. Do you agree or disagree? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a car. 89
- Describe a custom from your country that you would like people from other countries to adopt.Explain your choice, using specific reasons and examples. 84
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of produc 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
Some nations has seen a growth of sport programmes on th...
^^^
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
... games. The reasons for my position are as follow. First of all, it is an indisputable...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48657718121 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0945074418 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630872483221 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.8743138757 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.785714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211517299485 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581777345073 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523464255155 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12548245547 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399298626377 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.