When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One of the most common debate about designing a building is that whether functionality is more crucial than its aesthetical appearance.In my opinion the best use of a space is when form and function go hand-in-hand.
The notion for the creation of a building is to utilize the space as per the occupants need and requirements. For this integration of spaces, circulation patterns, services and variations in levels play a vital role. A space becomes functional when the categorization of activities is as per the users primary, secondary and tertiary needs.
Whilst considering the form exposed materials, shapes, surrounding landscape and aesthetics are essential attributes. A psychologist theory suggests that human develop a perception or judgment of an object in merely 20 seconds by its physical appearance irrelevant of its purpose. Physical boundary of a building acts as a barrier to light, noise, pollution and climate. The position of windows, use of materials and extrusion of spaces are physical aspects that are to be considered so that utilization becomes proper.
In order to incorporate liveliness in a space, utility and appearance have to be worked out simultaneously. To enhance the workability of a building facing of the spaces should be as per the direction and catchment areas.The use of materials is constrained to the placement of activities in a notified direction and its usage during different hours of the day. Also, if a building is designed accounting the internal activities, the creativity of its purpose will be superbly revealed.
To conclude, although it is widely discussed that only the fulfillment of internal functions is necessary and exterior facade has a minute role to play. The above mention points explicitly illustrate that form and function are relatively cohesive for the intended use of the building.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-08 | Richa Dhiman | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | Richa Dhiman | 11 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | sahil123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | Richa Dhiman | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | Richa Dhiman | 89 | view |
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 84
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 59
- Some people say that because of economic progress, government is ignoring other types of progress for a country. To what extent do you think it is correct? 56
- Writing a letter to building manager regarding a problem parking your bicycle.When you started to use bicycle to go to workWhat the problem isSuggesting the solution of the problem 81
- Some people think that children would benefit if they attend nursery school before primary school while some people think that children should stay all day with their families 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...crucial than its aesthetical appearance.In my opinion the best use of a space is w...
^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'occupants'' or 'occupant's'?
Suggestion: occupants'; occupant's
...ding is to utilize the space as per the occupants need and requirements. For this integra...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...s per the direction and catchment areas.The use of materials is constrained to the ...
^^^
Line 9, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ugh it is widely discussed that only the fulfillment of internal functions is nec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34013605442 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21243332867 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5734550984 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.769230769 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16771411467 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513583826005 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540324938072 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907913031576 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548431667825 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.