The diagram below shows the process for making a water clock.
The given figure highlights the information about the method for making a water clock by using two bottles withstand. It is a clear and coherent representation.
To begin with, the equipment used for making a water clock. The equipment was a tap for water, stand for holding the first bottle with the tape to maintain the constant level. Furthermore, the second plastic bottle head cuts off in order to collect the water falling from the first bottle.
Moving further, the process started with the tap water. Nextly, in the first bottle, the hole created and the straw was attached with glue which removed the extra water. Ater that, there was another hole in the bottom of the bottle as well as the hole covered with finger till the water not fulfil after that finger away from the hole. The second bottle head cuts off and water filled in this bottle from the above bottle in order to measure the water in levels per minute. Finally, the water removed from the second bottle and repeat this process again and again.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The line graph shows the percentage of people living below the poverty line in developing countries for the year 1900 to 2050 74
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue? 56
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Why do you think it is happening? Is it a negative or positive development? 56
- Consumer goods have become the most important part of human lives. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, second, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72067039106 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13929281887 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8949861092 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243414565565 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120187944818 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980856788466 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194418056207 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468666111697 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.