It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or this agree with this opinion ?
Learning the differences between right and wrong things is essential for children's development at an early age. Moreover, some people believe that giving a punishment for young people is an important way to teach them about this distinction while I personally believe that it is not necessarily a good method of teaching moral value for children, which I will explain below.
First and foremost, It would seem that not only might punishment hurt children's feeling but offer the negative impact on their psychology as well. To illustrate, if a child was locked up in a room because noises that he or she made when their parents had a guest, they would grow to be a shy and currish person due to the fear of punishment that they obtain in the past. In addition, It might be said that the guidance would be the more effective than punishment to educate children for separating right and wrong. This means that it would be easier to encourage children for doing a positive thing through the personal approaching given by their parents and teachers rather than a penalty that they get when doing a mistake.
Looking from another perspective, it seems that punishment is something that every child has to be through to become a good person. This punishment can be based on reason and has to be light in order to not hurt the children. However, in my opinion, why we have to take a risk for children's development to teach a right and wrong for kids if we have a better method such as guidance which would not offer a negative for children.
In summary, it is logical to conclude that punishing children has not to be considered by parents and teachers to educate their children. The reason given is that giving a guidance would be more effective and essential for teaching children to know about right and wrong things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | eslamyousry | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | shihan99 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | kingdangyeu0606 | 22 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Mimibae 985 | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, as to, in addition, in summary, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72955974843 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60611203593 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490566037736 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2075033081 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.727272727 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9090909091 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253852702074 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111871782629 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911885107049 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173688708866 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840193626682 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.3001002004 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.