The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The linear graph depicts the preference of European inhabitants regarding the different variety of meat which categorizes under four categories under fish chicken beef and lamb. The given study is conducted between 1979 to 2004.
To begin with, food made up of chicken has observed to more popular over the observed period of time that is it was only 140 grams per person per MI in ear 1979 and reached to 250 grams per person per week in the year 2004 after following a zig-zag pattern. Besides that, the lamp whose consumption was almost same in 1979 to that of chicken followed discriminative period and observed to be minimized in 2004 with only around 70 grams per person per week. Furthermore, the initial decline followed an exponential increase in its consumption in the year 1983 after which it followed a pattern of the plateau and finally it shows a decline over succeeded years and reached to only 100 grams per person per week in 2004. Last but not the least consumption of fish payment similar around 50 to 60 grams per person per week over observed time periods.
To sum up, I pen down by writing that in European, chicken has become their first choice of meat at beginning of the 21st century through in the late 90s hit was beef which has been changed altogether.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Lovepreet123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | anasrafiq | 73 | view |
- Today, high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- Some people believe that limiting the speed of vehicles to increase road safety is necessary, whereas others think that there are other ways to do so. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...erved to more popular over the observed period of time that is it was only 140 grams per perso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I pen down by writing that in European, chicken has become their first choice of...
^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the 21st century through in the late 90s hit was beef which has been changed ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72123893805 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48781587288 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553097345133 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5857127979 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.428571429 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2857142857 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2857142857 5.23603664747 235% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118921525981 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742072090344 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434642992325 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983327248758 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647511084648 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.