All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The author states that the companies who are hiring consultants, who suggest ways to help it perform more efficiently, are wasting their time listening to them. Instead, it should listen to it's employees. Consultants do give the best solutions when it comes to increasing profitability or recruitment or be it any issue. But sometimes, even employees have an abundance of ideas which will help the company to thrive. Spending more time with them and understanding their grievances and addressing their concerns will not only boost their morale but also make them work more efficiently.
The degree of the problem the company might be facing also depends on whether it should go to a consultancy or not. For example, if a company is about to become insolvent within a matter of few months then definitely sitting down and asking its employees for suggestions is not going to help. These kind of grave situations demand expert advice and probably it would be the best choice to go to reputed consultancy. But it is mandatory for a company to check whether it is a reputed consultancy. There are a lot of charlatans out there in the market who just look to swindle money out of naive people. If the company is facing minor problems, like employee issues, misunderstandings between the employer and employee or salary issues, then it is obviously not advisable to hire consultants which would be dilatory. This kind of situation can be explained by a simple analogy. For example, in a family if any of the family members has a bone to pick with some other person of the same family. He/she would not like to consult any outsider. Instead, they would consult an elder person of the same family and eventually would solve the issue just by talking to other person. Similarly the minor issues in a company can be easily solved by having a healthy dialogue with the concerned person/group. Finally a conclusion can be drawn which favors both the parties. It will be a win-win situation for both. This would not only be beneficial to the company's profits but also increases its reputation amongst the competitors.
To reiterate, the choice of hiring consultants or not solely depends on the company itself. The intensity of the problem the company is facing is also an important factor to be taken into consideration. Always it is a better idea to maintain a healthy relationship with the employees by taking their suggestions to improve even the smallest things in the company. It not only drives them to work harder but also keeps the environment of the company friendly and without any hassles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- DKLA was the innovator in the market for casual women s business apparel Smith Co was once the leader in that market with 2 billion in sales until styles changed and Smith Co s clothes went out of fashion DKLA can also be expected to fail especially becau 70
- Fossil evidence indicates that the blompus an extremely large carnivorous land mammal inhabited the continent of Pentagoria for tens of thousands of years until its sudden decline and ultimate extinction about twelve thousand years ago Scientists have det 75
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a wi 73
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 26
- "The most effective strategy for a company to use to maintain and increase profits over the long term is to maintain high ethical standards." 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'performs'?
Suggestion: performs
...onsultants, who suggest ways to help it perform more efficiently, are wasting their tim...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...s for suggestions is not going to help. These kind of grave situations demand expert advic...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1173, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
... issue just by talking to other person. Similarly the minor issues in a company can be ea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1296, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...alogue with the concerned person/group. Finally a conclusion can be drawn which favors ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
... factor to be taken into consideration. Always it is a better idea to maintain a healt...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, similarly, so, then, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82164719907 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.585866841 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7391304348 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1739130435 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08695652174 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372286952785 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100138620291 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664584906473 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257222103467 0.150359130593 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565711721625 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.