Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, transportation has a big impact on commuters. Many people thus propose to have more ways to reach certain destinations as we travel from home to work or to school especially when we want to take a vacation to different places thus having more cars are necessary. While others prefer fewer cars for the reason of environmental concern. In my vantage point, I agree that in 20 years there will be fewer cars than what we have in this generation.
On the one hand, I would say that having a lot of means of transportation would aid a lot of people. As time goes by, there will be an increase in population and people will demand to have more cars. Even though the population rises, there should be some limitations in using private vehicles. Instead of using cars, people should just use public vehicles such as a bus or train in traveling, It would be more convenient for everyone if there are fewer vehicles in the street due to it cause a heavy traffic jam. For instance, if all the people in the city will have cars on their own, then there's everyone should get up early in the morning to refrain from rush hours.
On the other hand, if there are fewer vehicles, we can assure that we can keep our environment from pollution. The cause of having a lot of cars needing a lot of considerations. Like for example, the government needs to widen the road because there is an increase in a number of people in a particular place including those who live in urban areas. Moreover, the more space they will use to create roads, the more trees they will cut down. And it is not helpful for decreasing the pollution because according to the studies, trees get carbon dioxide in exchange for oxygen. Therefore, the more carbon dioxide we inhale, the more we tend to get sick.
Thus, with the above in mind, considering fewer cars in the near future will be beneficial to each and every human mankind. It will be less hassle from dealing with congested roads and as well as very advantageous to our health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | TEJAS PATIL | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | Luis Cortes | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | fofty | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? "In twenty years there will be fewer cars on the road than there are today." 70
- Some people show their emotions, while other people work hard to keep their emotions from showing. What are the advantages of each type of behavior? Which do you try to do? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? "In twenty years there will be fewer cars on the road than there are today." 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun means seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of means'.
Suggestion: a lot of means
...n the one hand, I would say that having a lot of means of transportation would aid a lot of pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
... city will have cars on their own, then theres everyone should get up early in the mor...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54820936639 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5512200218 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537190082645 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8583967135 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1176470588 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3529411765 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187825838631 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064326174654 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617244936428 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123578650574 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387247950162 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.