In many countries, there are more people choosing to live by themselves than before. What are the reasons of this situation? Is it positive or negative to the development of society?
Nowadays, a rising number of people choose to live on their own nowadays. At the same time, however, there is some uncertainty as to the causes of this phenomenon, and how it might influence social development. In this essay I will examine the issue and seek some possible effects.
To begin with, in regard to causes, it is undeniable that different lifestyles may give rise to this situation. For example, the young tend to stay up and get up late every day, while their parents are eager to go to bed early and rise early. In order not to be disturbed by one another, the two generations may decide to live alone, rendering themselves greater freedom to do what they want. In addition, by virtue of better education, current young people in growing numbers have to leave their family and live by themselves in a different city. A good case in point is that metropolis, where there are plenty of prestigious universities, attracts students from the less developed places to dwell.
On the other hand, as to positive impacts on the society, there will be less burden on the government if people choose to live independently. This is because living alone may help them accumulate plenty of independent skills and solve problems on their own instead of relying on the society. Nonetheless, the relationship between family members can be undermined by this trend, since they are less likely to stay together and communicate frequently.
To summarize, there is no doubt that better education and distinct lifestyles result in the phenomenon of more people living by themselves. At the same time, however, this change may alleviate social stress and harm family harmony.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | oceanyang | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-26 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-29 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
- Fossil fuels(e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative effect? 56
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfied job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 56
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nonetheless, so, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, no doubt, in regard to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96441281139 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76240494278 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5871886121 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5087992092 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.307692308 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19613181925 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065508752131 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436532442735 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113894142886 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00720222172889 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.