Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Public health has been a concerned problem of many governments around the world recently. Therefore, some people suggest that more sports facilities should be built since it is the best way to improve public health. However, some contend that it is not the best ways because there are other effective methods should be taken to resolve the problem. I strongly agree with the second statement because of some convincing reasons below.
On the one hand, people believe that the increase in the number of sports centers results in the improvement of public health because of two primary motives. Firstly, only by doing exercises regularly can citizens contribute to their health development. There are numerous benefits of sports like preventing heart diseases and obesity, strengthening muscles, refreshing minds and the like which have been proved by scientists. Therefore, playing sports or going to the gyms are one of the best ways to keep both people’s body and brain healthy. Secondly, the more sports facilities built, the more people sign up to do exercises. In fact, citizens tend to choose the sports centers which are near their homes or workplaces; therefore, they can save a great number of bucks on traveling. As a result, they are encouraged to take part in sports programmes with modern facilities and professional private trainers.
On the other hand, playing sports and doing exercises is not enough to improve a person’s health. One effective measure that authorities should take in order to improve public health is to improve the quality of food products. For example, meals with a diversity of fruits and vegetables are far better than packaged ones. Governments should encourage people to consume more healthy food by opening more stores, supermarkets and restaurants which are specialized in organic and fresh food. Additionally, campaigns to motivate people to have medical check-up regularly at least twice a year should be held widely throughout countries, especially in rural areas. Only by doing so can people realize their health conditions to have suitable treatments on time. Finally, the health services cost should be reduced greatly for the poor and middle-class citizens. Consequently, all types of people in society can have opportunities to take care of themselves in medical centers fairly, which results in an increase in public health.
In conclusion, there are various reasonable measures besides increasing the number of sports facilities to improve public health. Governments should allocate more money for health centers and take care of people’s lifestyle to have an immediate solution for the improvement of citizens’ health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Amila Priynatha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Leeinho | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | MHT | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Gholamirayaneh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | junjunh | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 81
- The process shows how plants create food 82
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, at least, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2280.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4028436019 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86353597473 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504739336493 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 696.6 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3611831652 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0952380952 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322346724117 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106650379289 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830279724477 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226300996359 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313499992556 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.