The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
In contemporary society, modern families are not eating meals together as often as in the past. There are some factors leading to this trend, and this may have several impacts on household and community as a whole.
There are some reasons for this phenomenon. First of all, people do not have lots of time to eat with their family members because of the hectic work schedule. Employees are not spending time with their family members to complete their tasks. Therefore, family members today are rarely to eat meals with their family. Moreover, the development of the society which leads to a large amount of job and gives more chance to earn money than in the past. For example, some people often spend spare-time to seek out a new job in the evening after they finished work at their offices in the daytime because they need to find money that might help their young children have a good life.
This trend will bring some harmful impacts to every family on earth. Firstly, parents do not spend time for their children with cozy meals while modern life is becoming hectic with plenty of task from their offices. This will make children have bad habits because they lack guideline from parents. Secondly, parents have less time to talk with their children, and that will lose the family affection. For example, according to my mind, I claim that young children have a bad habit due to their parents are not teaching them. Therefore, the crime rate increases in modern life because they do not know how to become a good person.
To sum up, the disappearance of family meals attribute to various factors. This has several influences on both families and societies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | The Lazy Tiger | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | hammy | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Anh Nguyen 2604 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | nhathoa | 90 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | ngotrancamtu | 61 | view |
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Small businesses should avoid recruiting young women who do not have their own family in order to avoid paying maternity leave later on. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In the modern world, people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or product from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments’ expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import as little food as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun task seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of tasks'.
Suggestion: plenty of tasks
...ile modern life is becoming hectic with plenty of task from their offices. This will make chil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78819444444 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28557428809 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517361111111 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1748129071 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1875 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125086220785 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589678315222 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622710214241 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104819417818 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444929767774 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.