Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Libraries are vital assets in our daily life, although public libraries are little in use as the online internet service are widely accepted by the youth nowadays. A significant number of individuals opine that restoring and controlling these assets is useless since we have advanced online library systems. I strongly advocate with the above statement because of a plethora of reasons which will be discussed in the followings paragraphs.
Firstly, a fundamental reason behind that is it occupies space permanently and precious assets of the nation. Constructing building and implanting hard books, other pieces of equipment to maintain these materials involve a huge amount of funds, moreover, the manpower is required to maintain these things regularly. On the other hand, internet service is capable of replacing all this with minimum price and it is portable. For instance, the young generation these days prefer to read news on mobile applications instead of newspapers.
Secondly, another predominant factor is the lack of uniformity in the education system around the world. The paperbound books are limited in their knowledge and their presence around the globe. For illustration, the education system and awareness are not the same in the different regions of the world, comparing the western country with the Asian. The dissimilarity in the standards of teaching, learning makes the difference between schoolboys of different countries. Whereas, online reading material is the same for everyone.
In conclusion, taking care by spending a large amount of money on these facilities should not be considered as valuable, as it required efforts and various loopholes still exist, furthermore, the alternate technology is able to provide the better platforms with little cost. Hence, I believe it is insignificant to spend money on public libraries
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-07 | Rahat | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | bhatvishal@ | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | bhatvishal@ | 11 | view |
| 2018-07-15 | raparna | 78 | view |
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities. Others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- You are looking for a part-time job at a football club.Write a letter to the manager of the football club. In your letter,•introduce yourself•explain what experience and special skills you have•tell him/her when you think you could start 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48083623693 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92360034267 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9237935443 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.357142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0971931423796 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312656448507 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527011461452 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0567191771647 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041468636387 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.