The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mention table shows the sales of Fair trade which labelled for coffee and bananas in the given specific period in Sweden, Belgium, Denmark, Switzerland and UK. sales amount explained in millions of euros of given fair trade.
Turning first to UK, which had highest growth sales of coffee, increase significantly from 1.5 million of euros to 20 million of euros. The highest sales of coffee in 1999 was Switzerland by 3 million of euros, than the price of coffee in 2004 was double bigger from 1992.
Sweden was smallest among both in 1999 and 2004, which were 0.8 millions of euros and 1 millions of euros for the sales of fair-trade of coffee.
As Denmark was slight higher from Belgium as it was 0.8 millions of euros higher than Belgium, which was 1 million of euros.
Turning for table of bananas, Switzerland stand out as much higher fair amount than UK, which was million of euros, in 1999 and increase three-time higher in 2004.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-21 | Pham Mai Nguyet | 56 | view |
2019-12-25 | el-naz | 67 | view |
2019-10-08 | Sri Wahyuningsih | 73 | view |
2019-08-31 | Sonya Hsieh | 78 | view |
2019-07-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a species of large fish called the Salmon. 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
- The chart below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the year 1990, 2000 and 2010. 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 78
- The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...fair trade. Turning first to UK, which had highest growth sales of coffee, increase signif...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
... was Switzerland by 3 million of euros, than the price of coffee in 2004 was double ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
...ong both in 1999 and 2004, which were 0.8 millions of euros and 1 millions of euros for the s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
...4, which were 0.8 millions of euros and 1 millions of euros for the sales of fair-trade of co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
... slight higher from Belgium as it was 0.8 millions of euros higher than Belgium, which was 1 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Switzerland) must be used with a third-person verb: 'stands'.
Suggestion: stands
...rning for table of bananas, Switzerland stand out as much higher fair amount than UK,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...h higher fair amount than UK, which was million of euros, in 1999 and increase three-ti...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72121212121 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3333254624 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460606060606 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1113864581 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.285714286 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.28571428571 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0966753537718 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619443825554 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440647970672 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653861511111 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369271014896 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.